Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03247556

Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) High Dose in Adolescents With ADHD

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of high doses of SPN-812 in adolescents (12-17 years old) with ADHD

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Alliance for Wellness dba Alliance for Research, Long Beach, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm, parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of SPN-812 as a monotherapy for the treatment of adolescents 12-17 years old with ADHD.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy male or female subjects, 12-17 years of age, inclusive.
  • Diagnosis of ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5), confirmed with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID).
  • Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5, Home Version: Adolescent, Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHD-RS-5) score of at least 28.
  • CGI-S score of at least 4 at screening.
  • Weight of at least 35 kg.
  • Free of medication for the treatment of ADHD for at least one week prior to randomization and agreement to remain so throughout the study.
  • Considered medically healthy by the Investigator via assessment of physical examination, medical history, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiogram.
  • Written informed consent obtained from the subject's parent or legal representative and informed assent from the subject, if applicable.
  • Females of childbearing potential (FOCP) must be either sexually inactive (abstinent) or, if sexually active, must agree to use one of the following acceptable birth control methods beginning 30 days prior to the first dose, throughout the study:
  • simultaneous use of male condom and intra-uterine contraceptive device placed at least four weeks prior to the first study drug administration
  • surgically sterile male partner
  • simultaneous use of male condom and diaphragm with spermicide
  • established hormonal contraceptive

Exclusion criteria

  • Current diagnosis of major psychiatric disorders. Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder are allowed in the study if the subject is free of episodes both currently and for the last six months.
  • Current diagnosis of major neurological disorders. Subjects with seizures or a history of seizure disorder within the immediate family (siblings, parents), or a history of seizure-like events are excluded from the study.
  • Current diagnosis of significant systemic disease.
  • Evidence of suicidality (defined as either active suicidal plan/intent or active suicidal thoughts, or more than one lifetime suicide attempt) within the six months before Screening or at Screening.
  • BMI greater than 95th percentile for the appropriate age and gender.
  • History of an allergic reaction to viloxazine or related drugs.
  • Any food allergy, intolerance, restriction or special diet that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could contraindicate the subject's participation in this study.
  • Subjects who received any investigational drug within the longer of 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to Day 1 dosing of SM.
  • Any reason, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
  • Positive drug screen at the Screening Visit. A positive test for amphetamines is allowed for subjects receiving a stimulant ADHD medication at Screening; the subject will be required to discontinue the stimulant for the study, beginning at least one week prior to the Baseline Visit.
  • Pregnancy or refusal to practice abstinence or acceptable birth control during the study (for female subjects of childbearing potential)

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

Placebo was administered once daily

Other names: PBO

400mg SPN-812

Drug

400mg SPN-812 was administered once daily and compared to Placebo

Other names: SPN-812

600mg SPN-812

Drug

600mg SPN-812 was administered once daily and compared to Placebo

Other names: SPN-812

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of SPN-812 Assessed by Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

    The Primary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 7 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) symptoms of ADHD. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). A Total score is calculated by adding the responses of all 18 items (range: 0-54; the higher the score, the more severe the ADHD symptoms). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

    Time frame: Week 7 (End of Study)

    The first Key Secondary Endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale score at Week 7 (End of Study). The CGI-I scale is a single item assessment of how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state prior to the beginning of treatment. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = "very much improved" and 7 = "very much worse." Successful therapy is indicated by a lower overall score in subsequent testing.

  2. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Parent Short Form (C3PS)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

    The second Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Parent Short Form (C3PS) Composite T-score at Week 7 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for the assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3PS is completed by a child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 45 items with subsets of items related to six content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, executive functioning, learning problems, defiance/aggression and peer relations. The parent rates his/her child on the first 43 items of the C3PS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently]) based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank. Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome.

  3. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

    The third Key Secondary Endpoint was the change from baseline in the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P) Total Average score at Week 7 (End of Study). The WFIRS instrument evaluates ADHD-related functional impairment. The WFIRS-P is completed by the child's parent/guardian and is comprised of 50 items grouped into six domains: Family (10 items), School (10 items, includes learning [4 items] and behavior [6 items]), Life Skills (10 items), Child's Self-Concept (3 items), Social Activities (7 items), and Risky Activities (10 items). The parent/guardian rates each item on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=never or not at all to 3= very often or very much) based on their child's behavior past month. A Total Average score was computed by calculating mean rating of all 50 items (ranging from 0 to 3, where a higher value represents more severe functional impairment). Lower change from baseline Total Average scores (<0) represent a better outcome.

  4. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by 50% Responder Rate Per the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

    Time frame: Week 7 (End of Study)

    An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of responders at Week 7 (End of Study). A responder was defined as a subject who had a 50% or greater reduction (improvement) in their change from baseline Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Total score at Week 7 (End of Study). Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of responders.

  5. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

    Another secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) Total score to Week 7 (End of Study). The SIPA is a 112-item screening/diagnostic instrument for parents of adolescents 11-19 years of age that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions. Items 1-90 are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (where SD=Strongly Disagree, D=Disagree, NS=Not Sure, A=Agree, and SA=Strongly Agree) and yields a raw score for 3 Domains (Adolescent Domain, Parent Domain, and Adolescent-Parent Domain) that focus on a parent's perception of their child's personality and on the parent's characteristics and behaviors. The sum of the 3 Domain scores yields the Total (Parent Stress) score (range: 90-450; higher total scores indicate higher levels of stress). Lower change from baseline scores (<0) represent a better outcome

  6. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Subscale and the Inattention Subscale of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

    An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 5th Edition (ADHD-RS-5) Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale score and Inattention subscale score at Week 7 (End of Study). The ADHD-RS-5 is an ADHD-specific rating scale designed and validated to assess current ADHD symptomatology. The scale consists of 18 items that directly correspond to the 18 DSM-5 symptoms of ADHD, including 9 items for the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale and 9 items for the Inattention subscale. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often). Each subscale score is calculated by adding the responses of all respective 9 items (range: 0-27; the higher the subscale score, the more severe the Hyperactivity/Impulsivity or Inattention symptoms). Lower change from baseline subscale scores (<0) represent a better outcome.

  7. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Conners 3 - Self Report Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 7 (End of Study)

    An additional secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Conners 3rd Edition - Self Report Short Form (C3-SRS) Composite T score at Week 7 (End of Study). The Conners 3rd Edition is a focused diagnostic tool for assessment of ADHD and associated learning, behavior, and emotional problems in children 6 to 18 years of age. The C3-SRS, which is only validated in children/adolescents 8-18 years of age, is comprised of 41 items with subsets of items related to five content scales: inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, learning problems, aggression and family relations. The subject rates himself/herself on the first 39 items of C3-SRS using a 4-point Likert scale (0-3; where 0=not at all true [never, seldom] and 3=very much true [very often, very frequently] based on past month; the last 2 items are fill-in-the-blank and do not contribute to the raw score(s). Raw scores are converted to T-scores. Lower change from baseline T-scores (<0) represent a better outcome.

  8. Effect of SPN-812 Assessed by Categorical Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [the Percentage of Subjects Who Were 'Improved"]

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7

    An additional secondary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who were "improved" by visit; "improved" was defined as a subject who had a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 = "Very Much Improved" or 2 = "Much Improved". Values range from 0 to 100%. A higher percentage represents a greater number of subjects who were "improved".

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release Capsule) 400 and 600 mg Efficacy and Safety in Adolescents With ADHD - A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Pivotal Trial

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Aug 11, 2017
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.