Suez canal university
Ismailia, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05409950
The study was conducted on 20 immediate implant placement sites in the anterior maxillary region. In the study group, 10 implants were inserted using socket shield technique, while in control group, 10 implants were inserted using conventional immediate placement technique. All patients received immediate and 6 months post-operative CBCT to assess horizontal bone loss, vertical bone loss, and measurement of bone density. Implant stability quotients (ISQs) was measured immediately, 1st, 3rd and 6 months post-operatively.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ismailia, Egypt
Unrestorable tooth extraction with immediate implant placement is considered one of the best treatment options in restoring the esthetics and function. Extraction socket resorption is considered a challenging procedure when it involves the esthetics zone. The preservation of the entire attachment apparatus for complete preservation of the alveolar ridge makes socket shield technique a promising procedure that helps to maintain anatomy, esthetics and function. Socket shield technique, eliminate the negative consequences of bone resorption of the buccal plate of bone; leading to maintaining hard and soft tissue contours and provides a perfect pleasing esthetic result with good function. It is a highly promising technique in terms of maintaining pink and white esthetics through preservation of the interdental papilla during preparation of the interdental socket shield. It is considered a minimally invasive surgical procedure and offers the advantages of immediate implant placement.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Evaluation of socket shield technique with immediate implant placement at the esthetic zone in comparison with the conventional immediate implant placement
Time frame: immediate postoperative
Using osstell
Time frame: one month post-operative
Using osstell
Time frame: three month post-operative
Using osstell
Time frame: six month post-operative
Using osstell
Time frame: immediate postoperative
Using cone-beam computed tomography
Time frame: six month post-operative
Using cone-beam computed tomography
Time frame: immediate postoperative
Using cone-beam computed tomography
Time frame: six month post-operative
Using cone-beam computed tomography
Time frame: immediate postoperative
Using cone-beam computed tomography
Time frame: six month post-operative
Using cone-beam computed tomography
Time frame: immediate postoperative
using periodontal probe
Time frame: one month post-operative
using periodontal probe
Time frame: three month post-operative
using periodontal probe
Time frame: six month post-operative
using periodontal probe
Egyptian Russian University
Network
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07584629
Alveolar Bone Resorption
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05902689
Alveolar Bone Resorption
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06135506
Alveolar Bone Resorption, Dental Implant Failure Nos
Kafr ash Shaykh, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05484492
Alveolar Bone Resorption
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
View Trial Details