Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03991455

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the Apyx™ Device for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)

The aim of this study is to further evaluate this minimally invasive SSLF technique with respect to safety, clinical effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. The procedure will be performed in women electing to undergo surgical repair of their prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus, and will be evaluated using standardized measures and questionnaires.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rambam Medical Center

Haifa, 3109601, Israel

About this study

This study will evaluate sacrospinous ligament fixation using an incision-free technique - a technique that was developed with the goal of offering a technically simple, safe, and effective alternative to surgical prolapse repair procedures. When compared to previously reported SSLF methods, this technique has undergone novel modifications with the intent of maximizing efficacy and minimizing invasiveness. First, each sacrospinous ligament is approached trans-vaginally using a small diameter, low profile needle as the delivery platform for the anchoring unit. Secondly, the suspension is bilateral, thus maintaining vaginal length and width without deviation or narrowing of the vagina as might occur with a traditional (unilateral) sacrospinous repair. And third, using bio-degradable sutures and a securing element that stabilizes the fixation as opposed to performing an incision in the vaginal wall for suturing enables an incision-free procedure leaving the vagina free of any device after a period of several weeks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Women with prolapse electing to undergo reconstructive vaginal surgery for primary uterovaginal prolapse, who wish to enroll in this trial of an incision-free prolapse repair technique, after being familiarized with the suspected benefits and risks of the procedure.

  • Ages 18-90 years old
  • POP-Q Stage 2 or greater with an apical support defect, also defined as uterovaginal prolapse
  • Desire of uterine preservation
  • Patient is willing to return for follow-up evaluation and questionnaire completion at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, in addition to routine postoperative standard of care.
  • English fluency

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic repair for pelvic organ prolapse
  • Prior hysterectomy
  • Known allergy to Nitinol / Stainless Steel / Polydioxanone.
  • Suspected uterine pathology, including malignancy.
  • History of chronic pelvic pain, interstitial cystitis or fibromyalgia.
  • Women diagnosed with symptomatic uterine fibroids, cervical elongation or hypertrophy, abnormal uterine or vaginal bleeding.
  • History of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)
  • Prior pelvic radiation therapy or malignancy.
  • Diagnosis of reproductive tract anomalies.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Participation in another trial
  • Inability to provide informed consent for study enrollment
  • PI's subjective assessment that study procedure will not plausibly correct patient pelvic organ prolapse symptoms due to anatomic considerations

Treatment and study plan

Apyx device

Device

The Apyx device enables approximation and fixation of the vaginal apex to the SSL using a deployable anchoring system.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in PFDI-20 Prolapse Subscale (POPDI-6) score

    Time frame: 6 months

    Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) includes 20 questions are rated from 0 to 4, with 0 is no present of distress and 4 is the highest of symptom scale. Pelvic Floor Disability Index distress index is a subscale of the first 6 questions of the above scale

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective success rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    POP-Q points Ba less than -1 and C less than -½ TVL

  2. Change in PFDI-20

    Time frame: at baseline 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months compared to preoperative

    Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) includes 20 questions are rated from 0 to 4, with 0 is no present of distress and 4 is the highest of symptom scale

  3. Change in PISQ-12 scores

    Time frame: at baseline 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months compared to preoperative

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire -12 (PISQ-12) includes question for estimation of sexual function for women with POP urinary incontinence and or fecal incontinence

  4. PGI-I

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

    Patient Global Impression of Improvement include one question which describes how the patient evaluates the post surgery improvement with a scale of 1 to 7. 1 is very much better and 7 is very much worse

  5. Unanticipated Device-related Serious Adverse Event rate

    Time frame: at intervals of 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

    Unanticipated Device-related Serious Adverse Event rate

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Escala Medical LTD

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jun 19, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 27, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.