Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07079384

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After the Construction of Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis for Limited Mouth Opening in Maxillofacial Cases : Cross Over Randomized Clinical Trial

A patient's quality of life is frequently negatively impacted by oral cancer, which is a serious condition. Treatment for oral cancer, which includes radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, can result in several oral complications. The risk of impression material becoming lodged in undercuts and the challenges in retrieving the material would be inconvenient for both the patient and the dentist. Therefore, a digital pathway was chosen for the prosthesis fabrication process So, the present study aims to investigate the patient comfort and satisfaction after the construction of maxillary interim obturator for radiation-induced trismus in maxillofacial cases with different approaches: conventional and digital fabrication processes.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

55 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mansoura university

Al Mansurah, Egypt

About this study

A patient's quality of life is frequently negatively impacted by oral cancer, which is a serious condition. Treatment for oral cancer, which includes radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, can result in several oral complications, including trismus, xerostomia, dysgeusia, odontogenic infections, and osteoradionecrosis.

Aim: the present study aims to investigate the patient comfort and satisfaction after the construction of maxillary interim obturator for radiation-induced trismus in maxillofacial cases with different approaches: conventional and digital fabrication processes.

Methodology: The present crossover study will be conducted on 30 maxillofacial patients with maxillary defect with limited mouth opening, aged between 50 -65 years, will be selected for the study from the Maxillofacial clinic of the Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.A preliminary impression of the maxillary defect will be made with a high-viscosity irreversible hydrocolloid, covering all the margins of the defect and blocking all unfavorable undercuts with wet gauge piece.In a simple randomized method, 15 patients will receive obturator fabricated by the digital method.The other 15 patients will receive obturator fabricated by the conventional method Patient comfort and satisfaction by visual analogue scale (VAS), and Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ) at follow-up periods as follows: T0 immediately after insertion of obturator, T1= three months after insertion of obturator, T2=six months after insertion of obturator.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patient with unilateral total maxillectomy.

Free from any signs of inflammation in the defect area. The defect size is large.

Exclusion criteria

Patient is still receiving radiation. The defect size is small. Defects result from trauma.

Treatment and study plan

The patient will be instructed about wearing the prosthesis. First, seat the prosthesis in a posterior undercut, then rotate the prosthesis slightly superiorly in the defect area and engage the anteri

Other
  • The obturator will then be printed using Denture Base Resin and teeth.
  • The printed obturator will be tried in, two magnets, one anteriorly and another posteriorly will be picked up then inserted into the patient mouth.
  • The patient will be again instructed regarding the care of the prosthesis and hygiene maintenance as formerly. The patient will also be instructed to wear the obturator plate first, and once this is comfortably seated, the denture part will be inserted. During removal, the patient will be instructed to first remove the denture part gently to disengage the magnetic attraction after the obturator part as formerly instructed. The patient will be recalle

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS of pain

    Time frame: six months

    1-The patients used a visual analogue scale (VAS) to self-assess their level of pain, with 10 representing the most severe pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ)

    Time frame: six months

    The GTQ seems to be the most reliable tool for measuring trismus that is now available since a more comprehensive assessment of trismus and its treatment effects requires a multidimensional, self-administered, trismus-specific measure, which is what the GTQ offers. Its wider applicability would allow for consistent recording of trismus-related issues and a chance to get patient feedback on treatment results. The updated GTQ version had 13 items spread over three domains: eating restriction (4 items), jaw-related issues (6 items), and muscular stress (3 items). Scores on the calculated scale vary from 0 to 100.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Satisfaction After the Construction of Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis for Limited Mouth Opening in Maxillofacial Cases With Different Approaches: Cross Over Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 23, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.