A 3-way Crossover Clinical Investigation to Assess the Performance of Two Different Sized Polyurethane Condoms Versus a Latex Condom in Healthy Monogamous Couples.
NCT06557499
Contraception
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT01181778
Physicians counsel women participants who are candidates for hormonal contraception about available combined hormonal contraceptive methods (the combined pill, the contraceptive vaginal ring [i.e., the etonogestrel + ethinylestradiol vaginal ring] and the contraceptive transdermal patch). Effects of this counseling on women's contraceptive use decisions are to be evaluated by 1) recording which method is chosen after information is provided about all three available combined hormonal methods, 2) comparing the final chosen contraceptive method used by a participant after counseling with the method originally intended to be used by that participant before the counseling, and 3) evaluating the criteria used by women participants to choose their contraceptive method after the counseling, including evaluation of social and demographic predictors of contraceptive choice. The differences among participants in the number of contacts made by the participants to physician offices for purposes of obtaining information regarding the use of their final chosen hormonal contraceptive (e.g., requests for clarification, questions, expressing doubt or reservations for using the method, or requests for other help/advisement by the physician) will also be evaluated over four months following the physician counseling.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeHealthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
None
Time frame: Day of inclusion (Day 0) prior to physician counseling and after physician counseling
Before receiving counseling, participants recorded on a questionnaire the method of contraception they thought they would choose. This was to be compared with the method of contraception the same participants thought they would choose after they received physician counseling, which was also recorded on their questionnaire.
Time frame: Up to four months after the counseling visit
Participant contacts with physician offices were collected, and the number of callbacks by method of contraception recorded. Participants who called back more than once were counted overall and for each method of contraception.
Organon and Co
Industry
Observational, Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Educational Counseling Effects in the Choice of Different Combined Hormonal Contraceptives
Acronym: ECOS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06557499
Contraception
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07326007
Contraception
Giza, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05732142
Contraception, Gender Equity
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03127722
Contraception
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details