University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584CX, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Dr. G.J.M. (Maeike) Zijlmans Prof. Dr.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maryse van 't Klooster Study Coordinator, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06205160
The objective of this prospective interventional monocentric clinical investigation is to evaluate the feasibility and performance of the flexible high-density SOFT ECoG electrode grids, manufactured by Neurosoft Bioelectronics SA (test device; TD), in comparison to regular high-density electrode grids (ADTech, CE-marked) (control device; CD) routinely used at the investigation site during epilepsy surgery.
Subjects will undergo ≥ 2 additional intracranial recordings pre- and post-resection with the TD next to the standard recordings with the CD during ECoG-tailored epilepsy surgery.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Utrecht, 3584CX, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Dr. G.J.M. (Maeike) Zijlmans Prof. Dr.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maryse van 't Klooster Study Coordinator, PhD
CONTACT
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Test Device (SOFT ECoG subdural grid electrode): used for recording. During epilepsy surgery, in addition to standard clinical protocol (recording with comparator device), subjects will undergo ≥ 2 additional intracranial recordings with the SOFT ECoG flexible high density electrode grid (TD). Recording will be registered pre- and post-resection.
All procedures will be conducted according to standard clinical practice. Any medical decision making will be done using the standard of care CE-marked device (CD). The investigational, non-CE marked device is not used for clinical decision making.
Time frame: up to 24 hours
Performance in terms of signal quality is assessed via background signal to noise ratio (SNR). Only channels which record properly based on visual inspection (no noise, no flat line) will be included in the background SNR calculation. For the pre-resection recordings (SITUATION I/I*), the background SNR per (included) channel and the average SNR for the electrode grid will be calculated, and pairwise comparison will be conducted between TD (SITUATION I*) and CD (SITUATION I).
Time frame: up to 24 hours
The individual electrodes will be classified, per recording, as poor or good signal quality based on visual criteria (i.e., noise, flat signal due to overlap with resection cavity or silicone of secondary electrode strip, pulsation artifacts). As a result, an electrode deficiency ratio (%) will be calculated as follows: # bad electrodes divided by the total # of electrodes per recording. This will be determined for the similar positioned CD recording (SITUATION I/II) to allow comparison with the TD (SITUATION I*/I**).
Time frame: up to 24 hours
After the surgery, spikes and high frequency oscilations (HFOs) will be visually marked in the final minute of the recording (note: assisted by automated spike/HFO detector) and checked by an expert. Marking of spikes and HFOs will be done in the TD and the corresponding CD recordings pre- and post-resection. Event rates (number of spikes/HFOs per minute) per channel and total per recording will be compared between the TD and CD. The average event SNR per channel and the average SNR per epileptogenic event type will be calculated per recording. The event SNR will be compared between the CD recording (SITUATION I/II) and the TD (SITUATION I*/I**).
Time frame: up to 24 hours
The background SNR for post-resection recordings (SITUATION II/II**) will be computed and pairwise compared. Note that it shall be considered that for the post-resection recordings (SITUATION II/II**), in particular when measuring near/in the resection cavity, the performance of both the TD and CD for electrode deficiencies might differ significantly, positively and negatively.
Time frame: up to hospital discharge, on average at 10 days
The safety analysis will include surgical complications in terms of device deficiencies (DDs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), and whether these are device related (SADEs).
Time frame: up to 48 hours
A (digital) usability questionnaire (system usability scale + open questions) will be collected (within 48h after surgery).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
G.J.M. Zijlmans Study Principal Investigator, PhD
CONTACT
Karolina Janikowska Clinical Affairs Manager, PhD
CONTACT
Neurosoft Bioelectronics SA
Industry
The EpiGrid Study Evaluation of New Flexible High-density Intra-operative ECoG Electrodes for Epilepsy Surgery
Acronym: EpiGrid
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07656857
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07563881
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Palmdale, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07594119
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Bentonville, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07580183
Behavior, Brain Diseases
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial Details