University of Geneva
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT05443048
The use of complete removable dental prostheses (CRDP) is a reliable and effective treatment option for the rehabilitation of edentulous persons.
In recent years, the use of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods has become more popular for the fabrication of CRDPs, including subtractive methods (milling) from a prefabricated resin puck. They present various advantages compared to conventional fabrication methods, namely improved mechanical properties, superior surface characteristics, shortened manufacturing time and lower cost for the patient.
However, one of the shortcomings in the manufacturing of CRDPs from a single block of resin is obtaining an adequate esthetic outcome, as the transition between the gingiva-colored (pink) and tooth-colored (white) resin is not as precise as with prefabricated prosthetic teeth which are incorporated into a denture base. A novel technology has recently been launched on the market and includes a new design of distribution of pink and white resin inside a prefabricated resin puck, which would allow a superior esthetic outcome than previous techniques.
The aim of this pilot study is to assess the end result of one of the available systems used for fabricating digital dentures (Ivoclar® Digital Denture®), while using the corresponding monolithic resin puck (Ivoclar® Ivotion Denture System®), and therefore determining whether this new technique is an adequate option for treating edentulous patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Fabrication of maxillary and mandibular complete removable dental prosthesis with the Ivoclar Ivotion Denture System
Time frame: Baseline (BL, with existing dentures)
The transition between the pink and white resin will be evaluated by means of a Visual Analogue Scale esthetic score Maximum (best outcome): 1000 Minimum (worst outcome): 0
Time frame: Day 0 (T0, new dentures)
The transition between the pink and white resin will be evaluated by means of a Visual Analogue Scale esthetic score Maximum (best outcome): 1000 Minimum (worst outcome): 0
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
The transition between the pink and white resin will be evaluated by means of a Visual Analogue Scale esthetic score Maximum (best outcome): 1000 Minimum (worst outcome): 0
Time frame: Baseline (BL, with existing dentures)
OHIP-EDENT: validated questionnaire with 19 questions related to 7 dimensions, by means of a 6-item Likert scale Maximum (worst outcome): 7 Minimum (best outcome: 0
Time frame: Day 0 (T0, new dentures)
OHIP-EDENT: validated questionnaire with 19 questions related to 7 dimensions, by means of a 6-item Likert scale Maximum (worst outcome): 7 Minimum (best outcome: 0
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
OHIP-EDENT: validated questionnaire with 19 questions related to 7 dimensions, by means of a 6-item Likert scale Maximum (worst outcome): 7 Minimum (best outcome: 0
Time frame: Baseline (BL, with existing dentures)
Denture Satisfaction Index: validated questionnaire with 24 questions related to 9 dimensions, by means of a Visual Analogue Scale Maximum (best outcome): 900 Minimum (worst outcome): 0
Time frame: Day 0 (T0, new dentures)
Denture Satisfaction Index: validated questionnaire with 24 questions related to 9 dimensions, by means of a Visual Analogue Scale Maximum (best outcome): 900 Minimum (worst outcome): 0
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
Denture Satisfaction Index: validated questionnaire with 24 questions related to 9 dimensions, by means of a Visual Analogue Scale Maximum (best outcome): 900 Minimum (worst outcome): 0
Time frame: Baseline (BL, with existing dentures)
Chewing efficiency will be evaluated with a two-color mixing ability test
Time frame: Day 0 (T0, new dentures)
Chewing efficiency will be evaluated with a two-color mixing ability test
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
Chewing efficiency will be evaluated with a two-color mixing ability test
Time frame: Day 0 (T0, new dentures)
Denture quality objectively based on the seven criteria adopted from Alfadda et al., 2014, using a scoring sheet with 16 questions, by means of a 3-item Likert scale Maximum (worst score): 48 Minimum (best score): 16
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
Denture quality objectively based on the seven criteria adopted from Alfadda et al., 2014, using a scoring sheet with 16 questions, by means of a 3-item Likert scale Maximum (worst score): 48 Minimum (best score): 16
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
events such as adjustment and repair requirements will be recorded
Time frame: 3 months (T1)
open-ended contingency valuation (CV) method of questioning with the use of a payment card. The score is the amount in Swiss Francs the participant would be willing to pay for the treatment.
Maximum: no maximum Minimum: 0.
Frauke Müller
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07701200
All-on-4, Complete Edentulism
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07184320
Complete Edentulism, Partial Denture
Ajman, Ajman Emirate, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT07642128
Complete Edentulism, Randomized Clinical Trial
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07211022
Complete Edentulism
Tirana, Albania
View Trial Details