Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03833882

Evaluation of MAF-1217 in Patients With DED

This is a pre-market, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, crossover, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy of MAF-1217 and Cationorm® in adult patients with evaporative DED.

The study population will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED:

1. Group A: high evaporative levels 2. Group B: females in menopause, whether using hormonal integration or not 3. Group C: presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease 4. Group D: glaucomatous patients

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco P.O.L. Sacco, Milan, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients will be enrolled after having signed the informed consent form prior any other study procedure and after inclusion/exclusion criteria check.

Each patient will be planned to perform 6 study visits and at each visit all necessary study procedures will be performed according to the clinical investigation plan requirements (see flow-chart).

The study visits will be performed at: screening, baseline, week 2, week 6, week 8, week 12.

Patients will be enrolled at screening visit and at baseline, after the wash-out period of 1 week, then will be randomized to receive MAF-1217 or Cationorm® for the following 6 weeks.

After this time lapse, patients will be switched to the opposite therapy for 6 additional weeks.

The entire study population will be asked for a TID posology, and will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED.

Certain test will be performed only in some patients:

Osmolimetry and tear sampling in 20 patients(10/site) chosen random from groups B, C and D; Ferning test only in group D; tear film collection and cytokine expression only in 20 patients form site nr. 2.

Patients will be allowed to carry on any systemic or local medications, apart lubricating eyedrops, which have to be stopped the day before baseline visit.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years old (adult patients), male and female
  • Schirmer I test > 10 mm at 5'
  • (Group A): high evaporative levels
  • (Group B): females in menopause, both using hormonal integration or not
  • (Group C): presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease, defined as at least one of the following:
  • Meibomian orifice plugging
  • eyelid margin foaminess
  • changes in orifice position with respect to the mucocutaneous junction
  • abnormal Meibomian gland secretions (opaque and viscous-like form that is difficult to express)
  • (Group D): glaucomatous patients receiving one or more BAK preserved treatments for at least 2 years, showing an abnormal Ferning test (Types 3 or 4 according to Rolando)
  • all: wishing to participate in the study and able to sign the ICF

Inclusion criteria

to be checked at baseline:

  • BUT < 7"
  • Mild to severe DED according to OSDI chart

Exclusion criteria

  • Neuropathic causes of dry eye (diabetes, long-standing contact lens wearing, previous ocular herpes infections)
  • Coexisting corneal diseases
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Past or active cicatricial conjunctivitis
  • Past ocular surface burns
  • Keratinization of the eyelid margin
  • Sjogren syndrome
  • History of corneal trauma
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Younger than 18 years old patients
  • Use of contact lenses
  • inability to self administer study medications
  • (GROUPS B, D) Presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease
  • (GROUP C) Presence of cicatricial Meibomian gland disease
  • known allergic sensitivity to any of the devices ingredients or any other known allergy
  • participation in a clinical trial during the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study

Treatment and study plan

MAF1217

Device

The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.

Cationorm

Other

The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.

Primary outcomes

  1. Break-up time (BUT) differences

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Changes in break-up time (BUT) versus baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. ocular surface staining (corneal and conjunctival)

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in ocular surface staining (corneal and conjunctival)

  2. Schirmer I test (ST) (without anesthesia)

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in Schirmer I test (ST) (without anesthesia)

  3. number of blinking per minute

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in number of blinking per minute

  4. Ferning test (Group D)

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in Ferning test (Group D)

  5. osmolarity

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in osmolarity

  6. patient satisfaction (10 points VAS scale)

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in patient satisfaction (10 points VAS scale).

    (VAS: scale where patient has to specify level of satisfaction by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 - 10). 0 indicates no satisfaction while 10 represents the highest level).

  7. OSDI

    Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment

    Changes in questionnaire scores (OSDI - Ocular Surface Disease Index). The overall Ocular Surface Disease score defined the ocular surface as normal (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) disease.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VISUfarma SpA

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Performance of the Tear Substitute MAF-1217 in Patients With Evaporative DED

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Feb 7, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.