MAF1217
DeviceThe study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.
NCT Number: NCT03833882
This is a pre-market, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, crossover, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy of MAF-1217 and Cationorm® in adult patients with evaporative DED.
The study population will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED:
1. Group A: high evaporative levels 2. Group B: females in menopause, whether using hormonal integration or not 3. Group C: presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease 4. Group D: glaucomatous patients
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco P.O.L. Sacco, Milan, Italy
Patients will be enrolled after having signed the informed consent form prior any other study procedure and after inclusion/exclusion criteria check.
Each patient will be planned to perform 6 study visits and at each visit all necessary study procedures will be performed according to the clinical investigation plan requirements (see flow-chart).
The study visits will be performed at: screening, baseline, week 2, week 6, week 8, week 12.
Patients will be enrolled at screening visit and at baseline, after the wash-out period of 1 week, then will be randomized to receive MAF-1217 or Cationorm® for the following 6 weeks.
After this time lapse, patients will be switched to the opposite therapy for 6 additional weeks.
The entire study population will be asked for a TID posology, and will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED.
Certain test will be performed only in some patients:
Osmolimetry and tear sampling in 20 patients(10/site) chosen random from groups B, C and D; Ferning test only in group D; tear film collection and cytokine expression only in 20 patients form site nr. 2.
Patients will be allowed to carry on any systemic or local medications, apart lubricating eyedrops, which have to be stopped the day before baseline visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
to be checked at baseline:
Exclusion criteria
The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.
The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Changes in break-up time (BUT) versus baseline
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in ocular surface staining (corneal and conjunctival)
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in Schirmer I test (ST) (without anesthesia)
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in number of blinking per minute
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in Ferning test (Group D)
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in osmolarity
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline
Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in patient satisfaction (10 points VAS scale).
(VAS: scale where patient has to specify level of satisfaction by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 - 10). 0 indicates no satisfaction while 10 represents the highest level).
Time frame: measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment
Changes in questionnaire scores (OSDI - Ocular Surface Disease Index). The overall Ocular Surface Disease score defined the ocular surface as normal (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) disease.
VISUfarma SpA
Industry
Evaluation of the Performance of the Tear Substitute MAF-1217 in Patients With Evaporative DED
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06176651
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Disease
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06242860
Dry Eye Syndromes, Evaporative Dry Eye Disease
Citrus Heights, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03956225
Dry Eye Syndromes, Evaporative Dry Eye Disease
Long Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03843983
Dry Eye Syndromes, Evaporative Dry Eye Disease
Valladolid, Spain
View Trial Details