Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00406107

Evaluation of Macugen Treatment of Macular Edema Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intravitreal injections of Macugen every 6 weeks for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We hypothesize that macular edema secondary to BRVO is mediated by VEGF 165 and that chronic suppression of VEGF 165 will successfully treat BRVO related macular edema.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Retinal venous occlusive disease, which includes central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), is second only to diabetic retinopathy as a cause of vision loss due to retinal disease. The main cause of vision loss in all of these disorders is the development of macular edema. Current clinical practice based on randomized controlled clinical trials (ETDRS, BVOS) employs laser photocoagulation, either in a focal or grid pattern, to treat macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy and branch retinal vein occlusion. Unfortunately, laser photocoagulation is ineffective in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and no proven therapy exists for CRVO.

The pathogenesis of macular edema in retinal vascular diseases is generally accepted to be increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) due to ischemic or other stimuli. VEGF is known to be one of the most potent stimulators of vascular leakage in humans. Therefore, it seems sensible to study inhibition of VEGF to reduce vascular leakage, reduce macular edema, and improve vision in these retinal vascular disorders.

Phase 2 randomized, controlled clinical trials of Macugen in diabetic macular edema and in macular edema associated with CRVO have been conducted. In the diabetes trial, patients treated with Macugen had improved vision, reduced macular edema as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and reduced need for laser treatment compared to patients treated with sham injections. In the CRVO trial, patients treated with Macugen 1 mg every 6 weeks for 24 weeks had improved vision and reduced macular edema at week 30 compared to sham. This is the first randomized trial of treatment for CRVO to show a benefit over control. Based on these positive findings, we plan to study Macugen treatment of macular edema due to BRVO.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Macular edema secondary to BRVO involving the foveal center in male or female patients at least 18 years of age
  • Duration of BRVO macular edema less than 6 months prior to baseline visit
  • Best corrected ETDRS visual acuity 20/40-20/320 (Snellen equivalent) using the 4 meters testing method.
  • Central foveal thickness greater than or equal to 250 microns using the OCT-3
  • Less than 25% of foveal capillary ring disruption
  • Less than 2 disc areas of capillary non-perfusion within 1000 microns of the foveal center
  • Absence of hemorrhage or lipid in the foveal center
  • Investigator comfortable deferring macular laser for 18 weeks from baseline and intravitreous steroid for 36 weeks from baseline

Exclusion criteria

  • Ocular conditions other than BRVO related macular edema such as significant cataract, diabetic retinopathy, AMD, glaucoma, uveitis, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction or tumor.
  • Intraocular surgery within past 3 months
  • Significant enlargement of foveal avascular zone(>25% disruption of capillary ring) or greater than 2 disc areas of nonperfusion within 1000 microns of foveal center.
  • Likelihood of evidence driven indication for peripheral photocoagulation in the next 6 months.
  • Patients who have shown evidence of spontaneous improvement within the preceding 3 months, as determined by an improvement of >15 letters of vision or thinning of the Center Point on OCT of >20% from baseline determination
  • Prior grid laser within 4 months of baseline or more than one prior grid laser treatment.
  • No prior intravitreous or periocular steroid injections in the study eye.

Treatment and study plan

pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)

Drug

Subjects were randomized 3:1 to intravitreous injections of pegaptanib 0.3mg or 1mg at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12 with subsequent injections at 6-week intervals at investigator discretion until week 48.

Other names: Macugen

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 54 Weeks

    Time frame: 54 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standardized Change From Baseline in Macular Thickening Measured by OCT3 Using the Central Point of the Central Subfield

    Time frame: 54 Weeks

  2. Safety Parameters

    Time frame: 54 Weeks

    Safety endpoints incuded all investigator reported ocular and systemic adverse events. All events were graded as mild moderate or severe and assessed as related or unrelated to the injection procedure and the study drug.

  3. Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT From Baseline to Week 54

    Time frame: 54 Weeks

  4. Change in Macular Volume on OCT From Baseline to Week 54

    Time frame: 54 Weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Palmetto Retina Center, LLC

Other

Collaborators

  • Eyetech Pharmaceuticals
  • Pfizer

Registry information

Official study title

Open Label Macugen for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2008
First posted
Dec 4, 2006
Registry last updated
Sep 12, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.