Future University in Egypt
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04878939
There's scarcity in literature concerning the issue of anterior segment retraction technique and its effect on anterior teeth position. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial has been chosen to investigate this issue, aiming to support clinicians with the best guidelines for anterior segment retraction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–25 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Thirty females with bimaxillary protrusion were randomly allocated into two groups. In one group, anterior segment retraction was commenced using an elastomeric chain rendering 160 g/side extending between mini-screw implant and a hook crimped on 0.017- by 0.025-inch stainless steel wire distal to the lateral incisor. In the other group, anterior segment retraction was done using closing T-loops fabricated from 0.017- by 0.025-inch titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) wire rendering comparable retraction force. Three-dimensional analysis of incisors' buccolingual (BL)- torque, mesiodistal (MD)- tip, vertical position changes and root resorption were assessed using cone beam computed tomography scans.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Elastomeric chain rendering 160 g/side extending between mini-screw implant and a hook crimped on 0.017- by 0.025-inch stainless steel wire distal to the lateral incisor.
In the frictionless group, anterior segment retraction was done using closing T-loops fabricated from 0.017- by 0.025-inch titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) wire rendering comparable retraction force.
Time frame: through study completion (Pre/post retraction), an average of 6 months
The change of the outer angle between long axis of each upper anterior tooth and palatal plane on CBCT pre and post retracation and the change in the outer angle between long axis of each lower anterior tooth and horizontal plane on CBCT pre and post retracation
Time frame: through study completion (Pre/post retraction), an average of 6 months
The change of the angle between the long axis of the incisors and mid-sagittal plane on CBCT pre and post retracation
Time frame: through study completion (Pre/post retraction) , an average of 6 months
The change of the linear distance between the centroid of each maxillary anterior tooth and palatal Plane on CBCT pre and post retracation and The change of the linear distance between centroid of each mandibular anterior tooth and horizontal Plane on CBCT pre and post retracation
Time frame: through study completion (Pre/post retraction), an average of 6 months
measuring the amount of resorption using CBCT in mm pre and post retraction
Future University in Egypt
Other
Evaluation of Incisors' Position Following Anterior Segment Retraction Using Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04902430
Bimaxillary Protrusion
New Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04631419
Bimaxillary Protrusion, Dental Malocclusion
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04868721
Angle Class II, Division 1, Bimaxillary Protrusion
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05183451
Bimaxillary Protrusion
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details