Clinica Odontoiatrica Giorgio Vogel (Università degli studi di Milano)
Milan, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07252869
The goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of intraoral impressions obtained using the Trios 3Shape® and Carestream CS 3600™ scanners, as well as traditional analog impressions using polyvinyl siloxane (PVS), in comparison to a gold standard represented by a laboratory scanner in 51 dental models from 42 patients affected by partial edentulism who required at least two implants.
Researchers compare Trios 3Shape®, Carestream CS 3600™ and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) to see if there is a different accuracy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Milan, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A Comparative Study of Digital Versus Analog Impressions
impression taken by intraoral scanner
Time frame: Patients included in this prospective study were recruited from 2017 to 2022
The statistical analyses were performed using AnalystSoft StatPlus®. Using GOM Inspect by Zeiss®, the mean deviation values from the reference file were calculated for each model. They were expressed in absolute terms. In our study, for each of the three test techniques (TRIOS®-3Shape, CS 3600® Carestream Dental, and PVS), the average of the values obtained from the superimpositions of 51 models was calculated, resulting in the mean deviation of each method from the reference.
For data analysis, a one-way ANOVA test and a two-sample Z-test were applied, with a significance level (α) set at 0.05. These tests were used both to compare the mean distances and to assess the standard deviations of the deviations. Each technique was considered accurate if its mean deviation was less than 30 μm.
University of Milan
Other
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner Versus Analog Impression in Implant Supported Rehabilitations Performed With Flapless Computer-Guided Implantology
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01743846
Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Measurement
Kiel, Germany
View Trial Details