Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00782171

Evaluation of Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants With a Modified Surface

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a new dental implant with a modified surface in different loading protocols.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Tiroler Landeskrankenanstaltengesellschaft mbH, Innsbruck, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is a post-market randomized study whereby each patient will receive 1 to 4 implants placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible. The primary objective of this randomized open study is to evaluate the performance in immediate and delayed loading (4 weeks) of Straumann standard solid screw 4.1mm and the 4.8 mm diameter wide neck implants with a new surface. These implants will support single crowns or 2 to 4 unit bridge restorations in the posterior maxilla or mandible and the treatment will be evaluated for the immediate and delayed loading procedures at one year post surgery. Patients will be allocated into two groups and then randomized into immediate or delayed loading arms.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females must be at least 18 years of age
  • Have at least one missing tooth in positions FDI 4, 5, 6, or 7 in any quadrant (ADA positions 2, 3, 4, 5; or 12, 13, 14, 15; or 20, 21, 22, 23; or 28, 29, 30, 31.)
  • Subjects desire an implant supported restoration on1 to 4 implants per quadrant
  • The tooth/teeth position(s) at the proposed implant site must have been extracted or lost at least 4 months before the date of implantation and be fully healed
  • Adequate bone quality and quantity at the implant site to permit the insertion of a Straumann standard 4.1 mm diameter implant of at least 8 mm length without the use of concurrent bone augmentation techniques. If more bone is available and is indicated a Straumann standard 4.8 mm diameter implant with a wide neck of at least 8 mm length may be used, i.e. implant insertion sites must have sufficient bone height such that the implant will not encroach on vital structures and sufficient width that a minimum of 1 mm of bone lingual and buccal bone will remain
  • The opposing dentition must be natural teeth or fixed crowns or bridges on natural teeth or implants. Removable prostheses or dentures opposing the study implants are not allowed
  • Patients must be committed to the study for its full duration.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of conditions requiring chronic routine prophylactic use of antibiotics (e.g., history of rheumatic heart disease, bacterial endocarditis, cardiac valvular anomalies, prosthetic joint replacements)
  • Medical conditions requiring prolonged use of steroids
  • History of leukocyte dysfunction and deficiencies
  • History of bleeding disorders
  • History of neoplastic disease requiring the use of chemotherapy
  • History of radiation therapy to the head and neck
  • Patients with history of renal failure
  • Patients with severe or uncontrolled metabolic bone disorders
  • Uncontrolled endocrine disorders
  • Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
  • Use of any investigational drug or device within the 30 day period immediately prior to implant surgery on study day 0
  • Alcoholism or drug abuse
  • Patients infected with HIV
  • Patients who smoke >10 cigarettes per day or cigar equivalents, or who chew tobacco
  • Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability
  • Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis
  • Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus
  • History of local irradiation therapy
  • Presence of osseous lesions
  • Unhealed extraction sites (less than 4 months post extraction of teeth in intended sites)
  • Bone surgery (bone grafts, guided tissue regeneration techniques for bone enhancement) prior to implant placement unless performed more than 6 months prior to implant placement and the site fully healed. Note: Minor bone enhancement using harvested bone from the implant site and a resorbable membrane is allowed at the time of implant placement
  • Patients requiring bone grafting at the surgical sites at the time of surgery.
  • Severe bruxing or clenching habits
  • Persistent intraoral infection
  • Lack of primary stability of one (or more) implant(s) at surgery. In this instance the patient must be withdrawn and the patient treated accordingly
  • Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care

Treatment and study plan

SLActive dental implant

Device

Straumann® SLActive implants will be placed. Implants in Arm 1 will be restored with a temporary restoration on the day of surgery.

Implants in Arm 2 will receive healing caps immediately after surgery and a provisional restoration will be placed between day 28 to day 34 post-surgery.

In both arms, the final restoration will be placed between 140 and 160 days (20 to 23 weeks) post-surgery.

Other names: SLActive

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of Changes in Crestal Bone Levels Evaluated From Standardized Periapical X-rays Comparing the Immediate and Delayed Loading Procedures in Each Group.

    Time frame: Change in crestal bone level from surgery (baseline) to 20-23 Weeks post-surgery

  2. Evaluation of Changes in Crestal Bone Levels Evaluated From Standardized Periapical X-rays Comparing the Immediate and Delayed Loading Procedures in Each Group.

    Time frame: Change in crestal bone level from surgery (baseline) to 1 year post-surgery

  3. Evaluation of Changes in Crestal Bone Levels Evaluated From Standardized Periapical X-rays Comparing the Immediate and Delayed Loading Procedures in Each Group.

    Time frame: Change in crestal bone level from surgery (baseline) to 2 years post-surgery

  4. Evaluation of Changes in Crestal Bone Levels Evaluated From Standardized Periapical X-rays Comparing the Immediate and Delayed Loading Procedures in Each Group.

    Time frame: Change in crestal bone level from surgery (baseline) to 3 years post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Survival

    Time frame: 20-23 Weeks post-surgery

    Implant survival: An implant was deemed to be surviving, if it was still in place at the time of evaluation

  2. Implant Survival

    Time frame: 1 year post-surgery

    Implant survival: An implant was deemed to be surviving, if it was still in place at the time of Evaluation

  3. Implant Survival

    Time frame: 2 years post-surgery

    Implant survival: An implant was deemed to be surviving, if it was still in place at the time of Evaluation

  4. Implant Survival

    Time frame: 3 years post-surgery

    Implant survival: An implant was deemed to be surviving, if it was still in place at the time of Evaluation

  5. Nature and Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) - Number of Patients Affected

    Time frame: until the 3 year post-surgery

    Patients affected by AE Patients affected by related/ unknown AE

  6. Implant Success

    Time frame: 20-23 weeks post-surgery

    Implant success: An implant was deemed to be successful if there was a lack of implant mobility, absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings, absence of any recurrent peri-implant infection, absence of continuous or recurrent pain and absence of structural failure of the implant

  7. Implant Success

    Time frame: 1 years post-surgery

    Implant success: An implant was deemed to be successful if there was a lack of implant mobility, absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings, absence of any recurrent peri-implant infection, absence of continuous or recurrent pain and absence of structural failure of the implant

  8. Implant Success

    Time frame: 2 years post-surgery

    Implant success: An implant was deemed to be successful if there was a lack of implant mobility, absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings, absence of any recurrent peri-implant infection, absence of continuous or recurrent pain and absence of structural failure of the implant

  9. Implant Success

    Time frame: 3 years post-surgery

    Implant success: An implant was deemed to be successful if there was a lack of implant mobility, absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings, absence of any recurrent peri-implant infection, absence of continuous or recurrent pain and absence of structural failure of the implant

  10. Nature and Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) - Number of Adverse Events

    Time frame: until the 3 year post-surgery

    Number of Adverse Events Number of related/unknown AE Number of related/unknown SAEs Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institut Straumann AG

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Immediate and Delayed Loading of 4.1 mm and 4.8 mm Implants in the Posterior Mandible & Maxilla: A Controlled Randomized Study of Single or 2-4 Unit Restorations Loaded Immediately After Surgery or Four Weeks After Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2010
First posted
Oct 31, 2008
Registry last updated
Jun 20, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.