Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07461662

Evaluation of Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle Cleaning Techniques and Their Impact on Specimen Contamination

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscopy is commonly used to sample lymph nodes in patients with suspected or known lung cancer to determine the stage of the disease. Accurate staging is essential as it directly impacts treatment decisions and prognosis. During EBUS procedures, needles are often reused across multiple lymph node stations and are typically flushed with saline between samples. This raises the concern that residual tumor cells may contaminate the samples and could potentially incorrectly upstage disease.

This prospective study will evaluate the current technique used during EBUS procedures to determine if more intensive cleaning leads to reduced cellular contamination without affecting diagnostics. Patients undergoing an EBUS procedure for diagnosis with a large mass and a high probability of malignancy will be selected for the study. Rapid On-Site Examination (ROSE) will be used at the bedside to determine the presence of abnormal cells. Following the final pass, before moving to the next station, the needle will be flushed with saline as normal and then flushed again into another container to evaluate the presence of residual cells. The outcome may help EBUS needle handling practices and improve lung cancer staging accuracy.

No additional invasive procedures are performed as part of this study; all analyses utilize material obtained during routine EBUS needle flushing, with no added needle sticks or alteration of clinical care.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States

Location contact

Agha Baqir, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

George Abraham, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Michal Senitko, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mick Kelly

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Ricardo Ungo, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

6019845660

Ricardo Ungo, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Swathi Yarlagadda, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Syed Abbas, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Varsha Manucha, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Walter Rose, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Yanglin Guo, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

6019845650

About this study

EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a cornerstone in lung cancer staging. Accurate nodal staging under the TNM 9th edition guidelines is essential. Prior work has demonstrated that EBUS needle contamination can occur. A prospective multicenter study published in Archivos de Bronconeumologia demonstrates residual malignant cells despite repeated saline flushes with increasing flush volumes. A prospective observational study by Berim et al. showed malignant and non-malignant cellular debris can persist after multiple cleaning steps. Repeated flushing reduced but did not eliminate the contaminants, suggesting the current practice of flushing with saline may be insufficient to prevent contamination. The above studies demonstrate that contamination does exist in EBUS needle aspiration though there is no universal consensus on how to address contamination risk. The proposed project would identify cytologic contamination present in our current practices, without any additional risk from a procedural standpoint to the patient. This project would also examine the presence of malignant cells despite additional flushing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Patients undergoing standard-of-care EBUS bronchoscopy for evaluation of suspected lung malignancy
  • Patients undergoing sampling of 2 or more lymph node stations during EBUS bronchoscopy
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Age less than 18
  • Recent (1 month or less) radiation or procedural manipulation of lymph node stations that may significantly change lymph node architecture

Treatment and study plan

Purge cleaning

Diagnostic Test

Additional flushing of the needle into a separate vial

Primary outcomes

  1. Cytologic Contamination

    Time frame: From enrollment to the date of the pathological review report of the specimen taken during diagnostic EBUS sampling for a period of up to 32 weeks post enrollment and randomization in trial for each patient enrolled.

    To determine the presence of cytologic contamination following standard practice cleaning techniques

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Pathological Upstaging

    Time frame: From enrollment to the date of the pathological review report of the specimen taken during diagnostic EBUS sampling for a period of up to 32 weeks post enrollment and randomization in trial for each patient enrolled.

    To evaluate the incidence of pathological upstaging based on our primary outcome findings

  2. Effectiveness of Additional Flushing

    Time frame: From enrollment to the date of the pathological review report of the specimen taken during diagnostic EBUS sampling for a period of up to 32 weeks post enrollment and randomization in trial for each patient enrolled.

    To establish whether enhanced flushing protocols are required to mitigate the risk of contamination as evidenced by a change in incidences of cytologic contamination as reported by pathologic assessment of specimens taken after enhanced cleaning techniques.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ricardo Ungo, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

601-984-5660

Yanglin Guo, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

601-984-5650

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Acronym: EBUS

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 10, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.