V-Loc 180/90 Wound Closure Device
DeviceBarbed absorbable suture
NCT Number: NCT00959374
The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of an absorbable barbed suture as compared to a conventional absorbable suture when used for dermal closure during certain body contouring procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University Hospital Bonn, Frauenklinik, Bonn, Germany
One of the greater common challenges of a surgical procedure is to effectively and efficiently close wounds across various levels of muscle, fat, fascia and/or skin.
Surgical sutures continue to be the material of choice for wound closure. However, complications of sutures are those associated with tying knots to secure the suture. Examples of associated suture complications, although not comprehensive, include knot breakage and slippage, suture extrusion or spitting, infection, ischemia and scarring, reduced wound strength and inflammation and dehiscence.
Both interrupted and continuous suture patterns require knots for suture line security when conventional suture constructs are used. Barbed sutures are designed to eliminate the need for tying knots during closure, thus ameliorating the detrimental aspects of knots.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Barbed absorbable suture
3-0 Monocryl Absorbable Suture (non-barbed)
Time frame: At time of surgery
In calculating the total dermal closure time, only the intradermal closure time is used for those subjects that did not have the deep dermal layer closed.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Photographs of scars were obtained at 12 week visit and reviewed by a independent blinded plastic surgeon. The blinded assessor scored four elements of scar appearance on a scale of 1 to 5 each, including color match, width, borders and edges, and contour and distortion. On this scale, 1 = worst, 2= poor, 3= average, 4=good and 5=excellent. For the purpose of analysis, all scores for a patient were summed into a single composite score (4-20).
Medtronic - MITG
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized Study to Evaluate Dermal Closure With an Absorbable Barbed Suture (V-Loc 180 Absorbable Wound Closure Device or V-Loc 90 Absorbable Wound Closure Device) as Compared to a Conventional Absorbable Suture
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05665335
Breast Ptosis
Athens, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06262724
Breast Ptosis
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07657962
Breast Ptosis, Lower Pole Elongation
Sivas, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07197190
Breast Ptosis
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details