Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Fixation of Osteochondral Fragments With Reasorbable Screws in the Knee Joint

It represents a subjective score composed of 42 questions divided into 5 main domains. These domains investigate various aspects of symptoms and daily activities as well as the quality of life related to the knee and are divided as follows:

• Symptoms, composed of 7 questions, 2 of which pertain to stiffness;
• Pain, composed of 9 questions;
• Functions and daily activities, composed of 17 questions;
• Sports and recreational activities, composed of 5 questions;
• Quality of life in relation to the knee, composed of 4 questions. All questions use the same response format, utilizing a quantitative scale ranging from 0 (no issues) to 4 (severe difficulty). Scores are calculated separately for each domain and converted into a percentage score, where 100 represents excellent physical condition with no symptoms and 0 represents severe disability with limitations in daily activities and constant symptoms even at rest.

The Kujala score is a subjective knee assessment tool that quantifies limitations in daily and sports activities, as well as the presence or absence of symptoms. The questionnaire consists of 13 multiple-choice questions, with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Each question has a variable score from 5 to 10 points and includes 3, 4, or 5 multiple-choice answers. The topics covered by each question include limping, pain, swelling, flexion deficit, and difficulty performing various types of activities. The maximum score of 100 represents no limitations or symptoms; the further the score deviates from 100, the worse the outcome.

The IKDC score is a subjective knee assessment tool that assesses limitations in daily and sports activities, as well as the presence or absence of symptoms.

The IKDC score comprises three main domains:

• Symptoms, which include pain, stiffness, swelling, and the sensation of locking.
• Sports and daily activities.
• Current knee function and function before the injury.

The questionnaire consists of 10 questions:

• Seven items inquire about the patient's symptoms.
• One item focuses on participation in sports.
• One item, composed of 9 points, addresses the difficulties the patient experiences in performing daily activities.
• The last item measures the current functionality of the knee.

Scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the absence of limitations and symptoms. The further the score deviates from 100, the worse the outcome, which can be categorized into four groups: excellent (80-100), good (60-80), fair (30-60), and poor (0-30).

This represents a clinical chart that is completed by the physician following a comprehensive knee examination where various clinical tests are performed to assess for any joint deformities, objective instability, and meniscal injuries. The score obtained determines an objective evaluation grade coded using letters. According to this scale, grade "A" is assigned to a knee with "normal functionality, as healthy," grade "B" is assigned to a knee with "almost normal functionality," grade "C" is assigned to a knee with "moderately abnormal functionality," and grade "D" is assigned to a knee with "severely abnormal functionality."

The MARX questionnaire is a subjective assessment tool designed to evaluate the activity level of patients with knee disorders who engage in sports. It focuses on four domains of sports activity: running, deceleration, cutting, pivoting.

Patients are asked to approximate how many times they have performed each of these activities over the past twelve months. The four knee functions are evaluated on a 5-point frequency scale, and the scores are summed up to a maximum of sixteen points, where a higher score indicates more frequent participation and thus is correlated with a higher knee health status.

The MARX questionnaire differs from many other activity measures because it is not based on participation in specific sports activities. Instead, patients are asked about different components of physical function (such as running and pivoting) common to various sports. The aim of this tool is to identify the overall activity level of the patient rather than their most recent activity.

This is a quantitative, one-dimensional numeric pain assessment scale, ranging from 0 to 10. The scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of their pain, from 0 to 10, at the time of the visit and before the surgical intervention. 0 indicates no pain, while 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

Assessment of healing of the fragment fixation

Healing status of ostechondral fragment

Allows estimation of a subject's motor activity level with a score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports, such as national or international-level soccer. This score is commonly used to define the motor activity level of patients with knee disorders. Additionally, patients will be asked how many years they have been active in sports and whether the reduction or cessation of activity is related to knee pathology or not.

Measuring the circumference of the thigh at 5 cm and 15 cm from the superior pole of the patella allows for the evaluation of the degree of muscle trophism of the subjects under examination, and thus the potential influence of the type of technique used on muscle trophism.

In order to specifically assess the symptoms of the patellofemoral joint, patients will be asked to respond to these questions dichotomously (YES/NO).

In order to assess the level of patient satisfaction, they will be asked to respond to a question composed of 5 levels of satisfaction (from 1 to 5), where 1 indicates that the patient is very satisfied with the intervention, while 5 indicates a high degree of dissatisfaction.

Any complications, subsequent interventions, and surgical failures will be documented and recorded in the CRF.