Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05509127
Class V restorations are evaluated to reveal whether the use of modified universal adhesive will have a similar performance compared to conventional universal adhesive or not.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me20 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Cairo, Egypt
The innovative Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive offers all the benefits of its predecessor, Single Bond Universal Adhesive as demonstrated by a 3M field evaluation comparing the performance of the two products. These benefits include:
The newly modified adhesive with its careful formulation offers:
As with any new material or technique, long-term clinical evaluations are needed to demonstrate the value of universal bonding agents adequately. So, the aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the modified universal adhesive, versus the conventional universal adhesive, for restoring carious class V cavities over one year and a half.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Application of the modified universal adhesive is done according to manufacturer's instructions using a micro-brush. It is actively rubbed for 20 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds then light cured for 20 seconds.
Other names: 3M ESPE™ Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive
Application of the conventional Single Bond Universal adhesive is done using a micro-brush followed by rubbing for 20 seconds, gentle air drying for 5 seconds then light curing for 20 seconds.
Other names: 3M ESPE™ Single Bond Universal Adhesive
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.
using Modified USPHS criteria
Cairo University
Other
Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive Compared to Conventional Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07615582
Anesthesia, Behavior
Grenoble, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07667946
Clinical Performance
View Trial DetailsNCT05928533
Clinical Performance, Dental Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05334901
Clinical Performance
Giza, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details