Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07365748

Evaluation of Bacterial Contamination and Antimicrobial Efficacy on Charcoal-Infused vs, Standard Nylon Toothbrush Bristles.

This study compares two types of toothbrushes to see which one stays cleaner after use. Researchers want to know if toothbrushes with charcoal-infused bristles have fewer bacteria than standard toothbrushes with nylon bristles.

Participants in this study are adults and children who do not have gum disease or other major health issues. Everyone in the study will be assigned one of two types of toothbrushes:

* An eco-friendly toothbrush with charcoal bristles. * A standard toothbrush with nylon bristles. Participants will use their assigned toothbrush at home for two specific time periods (one day and one week). They will follow simple instructions on how to brush and store the toothbrush. After each time period, they will return the toothbrush to the researchers.

The research team will test the bristles in a lab to count the bacteria. They will also measure how well the charcoal bristles stop bacteria from growing compared to the nylon bristles. This will help determine if charcoal toothbrushes are a more sanitary and eco-friendly option for daily oral care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

8 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dental clinic

Cairo, 11585, Egypt

About this study

Study Design and Randomization This study employs a randomized, parallel-group, ex-vivo microbiological design to assess bacterial retention and antimicrobial efficacy. Participants are stratified by age (children and adults) and randomized to receive either an eco-friendly charcoal-infused toothbrush or a standard nylon toothbrush. Allocation is managed using computer-generated random sequences concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes. To maintain blinding, laboratory outcome assessors are unaware of group assignment, and participants are instructed not to disclose their intervention to the assessment team.

Standardized Usage Protocol

To minimize variability in bacterial load due to behavioral factors, all participants adhere to a strict hygiene protocol:

  • Brushing Technique: Participants brush twice daily (morning and evening) for two minutes using a standardized method (45-degree angle to the gingiva with short back-and-forth strokes, and vertical strokes for anterior lingual surfaces).
  • Storage and Maintenance: Post-brushing, bristles are rinsed under running water without digital manipulation. Toothbrushes must be stored upright, uncovered, and positioned at least two feet away from sanitary fixtures (e.g., toilets) to minimize aerosol contamination.
  • Restrictions: The use of antimicrobial mouthrinses, medicated toothpastes, or bristle covers is prohibited during the active study phases.

Sample Collection Timeline

The study involves two distinct usage periods separated by a washout phase:

  • Phase 1 (24-Hour Assessment): Participants use the assigned toothbrush for one day, followed by immediate return in a sterile pouch.
  • Washout: A 7-day period occurs where participants revert to their non-study oral hygiene routine.
  • Phase 2 (7-Day Assessment): Participants receive a new toothbrush of the same allocation, use it for 7 days, and return it in a sterile pouch for analysis.

Microbiological Analysis Returned samples are processed under aseptic laboratory conditions. Approximately one-third of the bristle field is excised using sterile instrumentation and transferred to test tubes containing 5 mL of sterile saline. The tubes are agitated to elute adherent microorganisms into suspension. A 0.1 mL aliquot is inoculated onto blood agar plates using a sterile spreader.

Plates are incubated in anaerobic gas pack jars at 37°C. Colony Forming Units (CFUs) are quantified after 48 hours of incubation to determine total bacterial load. Additionally, the intrinsic antimicrobial activity of the bristles is evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition (in millimeters) surrounding bristle samples placed on agar plates after 7days of incubation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants free of any systemic diseases.
  • Participants falling into one of two specific age groups:

A) Children aged 8 to 11 years.

B) Adults aged 18 to 35 years.

  • Willingness to use the assigned toothbrush type (Eco-friendly charcoal or standard nylon).
  • Ability to follow study instructions regarding brushing technique and storage.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with open carious lesions.
  • Participants with poor oral hygiene, defined as plaque index scores greater than 2.
  • Participants with severe gingivitis, defined as gingival index score greater than 2.
  • Current throat infections.
  • Irregular brushing frequency (not brushing twice daily).
  • Current use of mouthwash or antibacterial toothpastes.
  • Current smokers.
  • Medically compromised individuals.
  • Unwillingness to use a charcoal Eco-friendly toothbrush.

Treatment and study plan

Eco-friendly toothbrush for children

Device

it is an eco-friendly charcoal toothbrush assumed to have antibacterial property in children

nylon bristles toothbrush in children

Device

a normal man made toothbrush used by children

Nylon bristles toothbrush in adults

Device

a normal man made toothbrush used by adults

Eco-friendly toothbrush in adults

Device

to see the antimicrobial effect of eco-friendly toothbrush in adults

Primary outcomes

  1. Colony-forming units (CFU)

    Time frame: 10 days

    Bacterial load will be quantified as CFU per milliliter (CFU/mL) from toothbrush bristles after 1 day and 1 week of use. One-third of the bristles will be aseptically cut, placed in 5 mL sterile saline, mixed to elute bacteria, then 0.1 mL will be plated onto blood agar. Plates will be incubated under anaerobic conditions for 48 hours, then colonies will be counted and recorded as CFU/mL.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

MTI University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 26, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.