Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06803953

Evaluation of an Adjusted Cutoff Value for S.P.A.T (Skin Prick Automated Test) Device in Allergic Subjects

Skin prick test (SPT) is a first line diagnostic test to detect type I hypersensitivity in patients suspected of an inhalant allergy. A novel S.P.A.T. or Skin Prick Automated Test device has been developed to enable more standardised allergy testing. In two independent studies, Gorris and colleagues previously showed that test results after S.P.A.T. are less variable and more consistent compared to conventional skin prick testing (Gorris et al. Allergy. 2023; Seys et al. Rhinology 2024). In these studies conducted in volunteers, a cutoff value of 4.5 mm has been proposed based on the 97.5 percentile level of glycerol control wheals.

The current study aims to determine a cutoff value corresponding to the highest accuracy to discriminate between sensitized-allergic and non sensitized, non allergic subjects for both house dust mite and birch allergens.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide informed consent signed by study patient and investigator;
  • Subjects with Health Social Identification Number;
  • Allergic subjects with rhinitis with or without asthma and with or without conjunctivitis symptoms with proof of sensitisation to an inhalant allergy, either house dust mite ( Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) or birch pollen by a positive skin prick test (SPT) with a wheal diameter ≥3 mm as compared to negative control. The clinical response against the culprit allergen will be assessed by a positive nasal allergen provocation test. (patients must not have clinical symptoms corresponding to both sensitization).
  • Non-allergic subjects with proof of lack of sensitisation to any of the above referred allergens by a negative conventional skin prick test less than 2 years.
  • Normal lung function as judged by investigator with FEV 1 and FEV 1/FVC ≥ 70% of predicted
  • Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures;
  • Able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

  • Skin pathology like chronic or exuberant urticaria, dermographism, chronic dermatitis that needs daily treatment;
  • Any skin abnormalities, which could negatively - in the opinion of the investigator - affect the test results, including large scars and tattoos on the forearm ;
  • Patients with clinical symptoms corresponding to both sensitization to birch and house dust mite
  • Use of antihistaminic medication < 7 days before the start of the study;
  • Use of tricyclic antidepressants (antihistamine activity) < 7 days before the start of the study;
  • Use of topical (on the forearm) or systemic corticoids < 7 days before the start of the study;
  • Use of any monoclonal antibodies such as omalizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab < 6 months before the start of the study;
  • Use of oral systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening
  • Use of intramuscular systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to screening
  • Use of allergen immunotherapy for the allergen tested (<2 y) or another inhalant allergen;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Women without highly effective contraception (hormonal contraception, intrauterine device, bilateral tubal occlusion/ligation, vasectomized partner, sexual abstinence) at least one month prior to inclusion and during the study;
  • Incapacitated subjects;
  • Subjects who do not speak the local language (French);
  • Subjects who cannot read or write.

Treatment and study plan

Skin Prick Automated Test

Device

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Skin Prick Manual Test

Diagnostic Test

skin prick test to detection sensitisation to aeroallergens

Nasal Allergen Challenge

Diagnostic Test

nasal allergen challenge with either house dust mite allergens or birch pollen allergens

Primary outcomes

  1. Cutoff value with highest accuracy based on longest wheal diameter after SPAT

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The cutoff value that corresponds to the highest F1 score of the accuracy of S.P.A.T. to detect sensitisation to both house dust mite and birch allergens by measuring the longest diameter of wheal size.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of SPAT compared to conventional SPT

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The non-inferiority of the accuracy of S.P.A.T. compared to the conventional SPT to detect sensitisation for both house dust mite and birch allergens in allergic and non-allergic subjects will be evaluated by comparing the F1 score of SPT and SPAT, measuring the longest diameter of wheal size.

Other outcomes

  1. Intensity of allergy symptoms

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The intensity of allergy symptoms will be evaluated by Lebel score and compared to wheal size after positive SPT.

  2. Intensity of allergy symptoms

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The intensity of allergy symptoms will be evaluated by PNIF measurement and compared to wheal size after positive SPT.

  3. Longest wheal diameter measurement through S.P.A.T. web viewer compared to conventional ruler-based measurement

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The concordance of wheals' size measurement by the S.P.A.T. web viewer and investigator/ trained and qualified staff member will be evaluated by correlation analysis.

  4. Time to perform skin prick test

    Time frame: at time of SPAT

    The time to perform SPAT and conventional SPT will be evaluated by timing the duration between the start of executing the test and the end of the reading of the test (without timing the 15 minutes of waiting before reading).

  5. Longest wheal diameter with S.P.A.T. compared to average diameter with conventional SPT

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The longest diameter of wheal size measured with S.P.A.T. will be compared to the average (D+d/2) and the longest diameter of wheal size measured by conventional SPT.

  6. Cutoff value with highest accuracy based on wheal area

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    For the S.P.A.T., a cutoff value will be calculated similar to above by using the wheal area evaluated by F1 score.

  7. Accuracy of SPAT based on wheal area compared to conventional SPT

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The non-inferiority of S.P.A.T accuracy using the wheal area compared to conventional SPT longest wheal diameter will be evaluated comparing the F1 score.

  8. Cutoff with highest accuracy based on histamine equivalent prick index

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    For the S.P.A.T., the HEP (histamine equivalent prick) index based on the wheal diameter and wheal area will be calculated. The cut-off value will be calculated similar to above. The HEP index is defined as allergen induced area/ histamine induced area or allergen induced diameter/histamine induced diameter.

  9. Accuracy of SPAT based on histamine equivalent prick index compared to conventional SPT

    Time frame: 15 minutes after SPAT

    The non-inferiority of accuracy using the HEP-index compared to conventional SPT longest wheal diameter will be evaluated comparing the F1 score.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hippocreates

Industry

Collaborators

  • Alyatec

Registry information

Official study title

Definition of a Cut Off Value for S.P.A.T (Skin Prick Automated Test) Device Corresponding With Sensitisation to Both Birch and House Dust Mite Allergens, in Allergic Subjects

Acronym: SPATprovocatio

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 31, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 31, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.