Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00781703

Evaluation of a Natural Experiment to Improve Statewide Depression Care in Minnesota (MN)

The study will evaluate a unique natural experiment that aims to transform the primary care of patients with depression. The experiment's aim is to cause statewide implementation of an evidence-based care model for depression by changing the reimbursement system and by using an established regional collaborative (the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) to both facilitate the model's widespread use and certify that medical groups have implemented it. Study hypotheses include the following:

1. Newly treated depressed patients in medical groups that have implemented the new reimbursement and facilitation will report receiving higher rates of best care processes than such patients in these medical groups before implementation. 2. Rates of best care practices reported to be received by newly treated depressed patients two years after each medical group implements changes will be maintained at least at the rate reported by patients one year post implementation. 3. Newly treated depressed patients in medical groups that have participated in the new reimbursement and facilitation will have greater improvement in depression symptoms and work productivity and lower healthcare costs than such patients in groups before participation. 4. Medical group measures of priority for improving depression care, capability to manage change, and practice systems will be predictive of more patient-reported best care processes, both at one point in time and in change over time.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

The study will use a multiple baseline across settings with staggered implementation to test the effects of changed reimbursement and facilitated organizational change on the use and sustainability of evidenced-based care processes for patients with depression. The study will also test the effect of the care process changes on changes in depression symptoms, healthcare costs, and work productivity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • major depression
  • Patient Health Questionaire (PHQ-9) > 9
  • primary care management of depression

Exclusion criteria

  • comorbid psychiatric conditions

Treatment and study plan

DIAMOND depression care model

Other

Patients in activated clinic sites will receive the DIAMOND depression care model, including a care manager, frequent use of the PHQ9, treatment adjustment as indicated, psychiatric consultation, relapse prevention.

Primary outcomes

  1. Rates of best care processes

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in depression symptoms, work productivity and total healthcare costs

    Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

DIAMOND Study: Evaluation of a Natural Experiment to Improve Statewide Depression Care in MN

Acronym: DIAMOND

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2014
First posted
Oct 29, 2008
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.