Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02191085

Evaluation of a "Fast Track" Respiratory Therapy Clinic for Patients With Suspected Severe Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Access to medical care for patients with breathing disorders during sleep is a major problem for Canadians. Recently, there has been increasing interest in how health care providers who are not physicians can help to improve access to medical care for these patients, but it is unclear whether patients with severe sleep-disordered breathing who receive care from these non-physician providers have the same response to treatment as patients who receive care from physicians. Since these severe have a high risk of developing cardiac and respiratory complications and of being hospitalized, an initiative to improve access such as the use of non-physician providers could be of great benefit to individual patients and the health care system.

The objectives of this project are:

1. to determine whether patients with severe breathing disorders during sleep have the same response to treatment when cared for by non-physician health care providers (respiratory therapists) as they do when cared for by physicians; 2. to determine the effects of non-physician health care provider treatment to patient access; 3. to determine health care utilization and related costs associated with non-physician health care provider treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Foothills Medical Centre Sleep Centre

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada

About this study

The difficulty in providing timely access to sleep specialists is widespread. These delays are particularly important for patients with severe sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) due to the increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes and potential associated healthcare costs. The lack of timely access has sparked an interest in the use of alternate care providers (ACPs) to manage patients with SDB. Our group and others have demonstrated that ACPs are an effective and efficient substitute for physicians for patients with uncomplicated SDB. However, the role of ACPs in the management of patients with severe SDB remains unclear.

Prompted by wait times that far exceed current Canadian guidelines, we have recently implemented an ACP-led "Fast Track" clinic for patients who are referred to the Foothills Medical Centre (FMC) Sleep Centre with suspected severe SDB. In this clinic, patients with suspected severe SDB are assessed by a sleep-trained registered respiratory therapist functioning as an ACP. Decisions regarding further sleep testing and treatment are made by the patient and ACP, under the guidance of a sleep physician. This model of care differs from a physician-led model that is used at the FMC Sleep Centre.

To evaluate this novel care delivery model, we have designed a randomized trial comparing outcomes for patients in the "Fast Track" clinic to those who undergo conventional, physician-led care. The specific goals of this study are:

  • to compare the clinical effectiveness of an ACP-led clinic for patients with suspected severe SDB to physician-led management;
  • to determine whether cycle times from referral to diagnosis and treatment for patients referred with suspected severe SDB can be reduced by an ACP-led clinic;
  • to determine the impact of an ACP-led clinic on the demand for sleep physicians, ACPs and diagnostic testing;
  • to compare the cost-effectiveness of these models of care using data on healthcare utilization, costs, and patient reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Patients in the "Standard Management" arm will be assessed by a sleep respirologist and follow a management plan that is determined by the sleep physician and patient. This plan may involve polysomnography or the initiation of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. If further testing is ordered, follow-up may occur with the physician or with an ACP, at the physician's discretion. For patients initiating PAP therapy, the decision to delegate follow-up to an ACP will be left up to the physician, as the intent of this study is to observe real-world practice and not to change the management of individual patients.

In the "Fast Track" arm, an ACP will perform the initial assessment and will determine the management plan with the patient. To ensure patient safety, the management plan will be discussed with a sleep respirologist, who will be designated as the patient's primary sleep physician. This sleep physician will be available at the FMC Sleep Centre during the "Fast Track" clinic to assist with the assessment of patients who appear unwell (e.g. severe hypoxemia, decompensated cardiorespiratory failure, etc.). As in the "Standard Management" arm, follow-up visits to review test results, discuss and initiate treatment, or to assess treatment response may occur with the ACP who performed the initial assessment or may be delegated to any other ACP.

As is usual procedure at the FMC Sleep Centre, ambulatory sleep test requisitions will be completed by ACPs or physicians, whereas all polysomnogram requisitions will be completed by the primary sleep physician to ensure adequate blinding of patient assignment. The research associate will ensure that all tests are interpreted in advance of clinic visits. Patients who are followed by ACPs in either arm can be referred to the primary sleep physician for assessment of non-respiratory sleep disorders, or for persistent symptoms such as daytime sleepiness.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • referred to the FMC Sleep Centre for assessment of SDB
  • meet one of the three criteria for suspected severe SDB:
  • Respiratory disturbance index (RDI) >/= 30 events/hour on an ambulatory sleep test
  • Mean nocturnal oxygen saturation </= 85% on an ambulatory sleep test
  • Suspected hypoventilation, defined by an RDI >/= 15 events/hour on an ambulatory sleep test and partial pressure of carbon dioxide >/= 45 mmHg on arterial blood gas
  • On supplemental oxygen therapy with high suspicion of SDB (as determined by physician review of referral)

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspected concomitant sleep disorder other than SDB
  • A previous diagnosis of OSA treated with PAP or dental appliance
  • Primary health insurance provided by a province other than Alberta
  • Failure to provide consent to participate in the study
  • Under the age of 18

Treatment and study plan

Fast Track

Procedure

In the "Fast Track" arm, an ACP will perform the initial assessment and will determine the management plan with the patient. To ensure patient safety, the management plan will be discussed with a sleep respirologist, who will be designated as the patient's primary sleep physician. This sleep physician will be available at the FMC Sleep Centre during the "Fast Track" clinic to assist with the assessment of patients who appear unwell. As in the "Standard Management" arm, follow-up visits to review test results, discuss and initiate treatment, or to assess treatment response may occur with the ACP who performed the initial assessment or may be delegated to any other ACP.

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Therapy

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation

    Data includes number of hours used per night on all nights

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Daytime Sleepiness

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation

    Epworth Sleepiness Scale - this is a subjective scale measuring tendency for an individual to fall asleep in 8 different circumstances. Score is 0-3 for each circumstance but is reported as a total score.

    Minimum total score = 0, Maximum total score = 24 Higher scores mean worse outcome

  2. Health Care Utilization

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Costs for physician visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations

  3. Total Healthcare Costs

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Comparing costs for each arm (used to calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio)

  4. Time From Date of Referral to Date of Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Expected within 1 year (unknown due to nature of outcome)

    Comparing cycle times for intervention vs. control arm

  5. Change in Daytime Sleepiness

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Epworth Sleepiness Scale - a subjective scale measuring tendency for an individual to fall asleep in 8 different circumstances. Total score is sum of score in each circumstance (0-3) Minimum total score = 0, Maximum total score = 24 Higher scores mean worse outcome

  6. Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Therapy

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Data includes number of hours used per night.

  7. Change in Disease Specific Health-related Quality of Life

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation

    Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index - subjective disease-specific quality of life scale, incorporating 4 domains measured pre/post intervention (scored 1-7 on a Likert scale) and 3 post-intervention domains that are weighted before incorporated in the final score Minimum = 1 Maximum = 7 Higher scores indicate a better outcome

  8. Change in Disease Specific Health-related Quality of Life

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index - subjective disease-specific quality of life scale, incorporating 4 domains measured pre/post intervention (scored 1-7 on a Likert scale) and 3 post-intervention domains that are weighted before incorporated in the final score Minimum = 1 Maximum = 7 Higher scores indicate a better outcome

  9. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation

    Visit-Specific Instrument (VSQ-9) - comprises 9 questions for which patients assign a Likert scale score from 0-5. Score is reported as sum of Likert scale score for each question 0 to 45 scale Higher scores mean a better outcome.

  10. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Visit-Specific Instrument (VSQ-9) - comprises 9 questions for which patients assign a Likert scale score from 0-5. Score is reported as sum of Likert scale score for each question 0 to 45 scale Higher scores mean a better outcome.

  11. Number of Sleep Diagnostic Tests and Sleep Ambulatory Care Visits

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Reported as costs for home sleep apnea tests, polysomnograms, new and follow-up clinical visits

  12. Change in Severity of Sleep-disordered Breathing

    Time frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment initiation

    Respiratory event index from ambulatory testing - reported values represent change from baseline to 3 months

  13. Change in Severity of Sleep-disordered Breathing

    Time frame: baseline and 1 year after treatment initiation

    Respiratory event index from ambulatory testing - reported values represent change from baseline to 3 months

  14. Change in General Health-related Quality of Life

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment initiation

    Health Utilities Index - a 17-question general health related quality of life index. Total score indicates subjective assessment of HRQOL from close to death to perfect health Maximum = 1 Minimum = 0 Higher score means a better outcome

  15. Change in General Health-related Quality of Life

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Health Utilities Index - a 17-question general health related quality of life index. Total score indicates subjective assessment of HRQOL from close to death to perfect health Maximum = 1 Minimum = 0 Higher score means a better outcome

  16. Quality Adjusted Life Years

    Time frame: 1 year after treatment initiation

    Comparing quality adjusted life years for each arm (used to calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio). Quality adjusted life years were estimated using a utility score ranging from 0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health) derived from the HUI3 questionnaire, combined with the total length of follow-up time for each patient at baseline 12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary

Other

Collaborators

  • The Lung Association

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jul 15, 2014
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.