All Sum Research Center Ltd.
Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 6J2, Canada
NCT Number: NCT05766995
To compare three different oral hygiene regimens on changes in gum tissue appearance, gum bleeding, and plaque scores.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 6J2, Canada
The goal of this clinical trial was to compare the effect of different battery powered water in and adult population with mild to moderate gingivitis. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare the two groups using a water flosser (experimental) to see how it compares to traditional brushing and flossing (control).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A pulsating water flosser and jet tip designed to clean between the teeth and below the gingival margin.
Other names: dental water jet, oral irrigator
A water flosser and specialized tip that delivers water with microbubbles of air
Other names: dental water jet, oral irrigator
Nylon string used to clean between the teeth manually
Time frame: 4 weeks
Bleeding recorded on 6 sites per tooth within 30 seconds of instrumentation. 0 = no bleeding, 1= bleeding. Bleeding determined by number of sites bleeding divided by total number of sites = percent bleeding
Time frame: 4 weeks
Visual assessment of the gingival tissue. 0 = absence of inflammation, 1 = mild inflammation (slight change in color, little change in texture of any porting of but not the entire marginal or papillary gingival area), 3 = moderate inflammation (glazing, redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival area), 4 = severe inflammation (marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival area, spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Plaque is assessed for each tooth area (divided into 9 sections labeled A through I) and scored using the following scale: 0 = absent, and 1 = present. Facial and lingual surfaces of all gradable teeth are scored and a mean plaque index is calculated for each subject at each examination. Subjects' scores were calculated for whole mouth (A through I), along the gingival margin (A through C), and at the proximal (approximal) areas (D and F).
Water Pik, Inc.
Industry
Efficacy of Three Oral Self-care Regimens on Clinical Parameters of Inflammation and Plaque: Part 1 - a Four Week Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07224828
Gingival Diseases, Gingivitis
San Juan, Puerto Rico
View Trial DetailsNCT07725276
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Beirut, Rue de Damas, Lebanon
View Trial DetailsNCT07488403
Gingival Diseases, Gingivitis
Antalya, KONYAALTI, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07642037
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Sibiu, Sibiu County, Romania
View Trial Details