Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States
NCT Number: NCT03657849
This study compares the yield of 19-gauge needles vs 21-gauge needles during EBUS TBNA procedures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS-TBNA) is a technique used to take samples of body tissue inside the chest without having to undergo an operation.
During this procedure, a special telescope (called a bronchoscope) is inserted through the mouth into the airways. Ultrasound technology allows the doctor to see the structures just outside the airway. By being able to see the structures outside the airway, the doctor is able to safely pass a fine needle through the airway to take samples of abnormal tissue.
EBUS-TBNA is used to take samples of tissue from the mediastinum. The mediastinum is the part of the chest between the lungs, and contains the heart, gullet, windpipe and lymph nodes. This area of the body is usually difficult to access without open surgery, hence the use of EBUS-TBNA. EBUS-TBNA may be used to investigate enlarged lymph nodes. This may be due to tuberculosis, sarcoidosis or cancer.
Currently, smaller 21-gauge and larger 19-gauge needles are used during the EBUS-TBNA procedure at Regions Hospital. The purpose of this study is to find out which needle is better in finding the explanation for the enlarged lymph nodes, and any follow up procedures that may be necessary if the investigators are unable to get enough tissue during the EBUS-TBNA procedure (surgical sampling, radiological sampling, and/or follow-up imaging).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All patients undergo EBUS TBNA with two needle sizes
Time frame: 6 months
Diagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141).
Diagnostic yield of 19-gauge needle: 89.4% Diagnostic yield of 21-gauge needled: 88.7%
Time frame: 6 months
Diagnostic yield refers to the proportion of tissue samples collected by each needle (19 gauge vs 21 gauge) that were of sufficient quantity and quality to yield (i.e. produce) an accurate diagnosis for the patient's enlarged lymph nodes. Characterization of diagnostic category (true positive, true negative, false negative, false positive) were made by comparing the patient's presumed diagnosis/initial indication for presentation in comparison to their final diagnosis as determined by a combination of pathological findings of EBUS-TBNA, follow up imaging, surgical sampling, or clinical follow up. The diagnostic yield of each needles was reported as a ratio of true positives and true negatives added together, divided by the total number of lymph nodes sampled (141).
HealthPartners Institute
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04872738
Breast Cancer Lymphedema, Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03499808
Amorphous, Eosinophilic, and Acellular Deposit, Amyloidosis
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06429020
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Tainan, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04743583
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Roma, Italy
View Trial Details