Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital
Beijing, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06675942
Although mechanical ventilation (MV) is life-saving, it is associated with several complications. The establishment of an artificial airway impairs the cough reflex and mucociliary function, leading to the accumulation of secretions in the tracheobronchial tree. This increases the risk of pneumonia and lung atelectasis. Usual care for mechanically ventilated patients includes airway suctioning via the tracheostomy tube, which clears only a limited portion of the airway and is ineffective at removing peripheral airway secretions.
To address this, airway clearance guidelines recommend various airway clearance techniques (ACTs) for mechanically ventilated patients to enhance mucus removal. However, the lack of standardized, effective evaluation criteria makes selecting the optimal ACT a challenge.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, China
Location status: Recruiting
The aim of this randomized cross-over study was to compare the effectiveness of oscillation and lung expansion (OLE) versus high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) on lung aeration and ventilation distribution, as assessed by EIT, in medically complex, hypersecretive patients with tracheostomy tubes requiring long-term mechanical ventilation (MV).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The OLE device (MetaNeb system) is a newer, noninvasive physiotherapy tool that combines mechanical and pharmacological interventions (aerosols) to help mobilize endobronchial secretions.
High-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is an airway clearance technique that uses external forces applied to the chest via an inflatable vest connected to a device that generates vibrations at varying frequencies and pressures.
Time frame: at the end of treatment (T1) and at 1 hour (T2), 2 hours (T3), 4 hours (T4)
Time frame: at the end of treatment (T1) and at 1 hour (T2), 2 hours (T3), 4 hours (T4)
Time frame: at the end of treatment (T1) and at 1 hour (T2), 2 hours (T3), 4 hours (T4)
Time frame: at the end of treatment (T1) and at 1 hour (T2), 2 hours (T3), 4 hours (T4)
Time frame: at the end of treatment (T1) and at 1 hour (T2), 2 hours (T3), 4 hours (T4)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Capital Medical University
Other
Evaluating the Short-term Efficacy of Two Oscillation Techniques in Hypersecretive Mechanically Ventilated Patients: a Randomized Crossover Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.