HIFU
Devicehigh-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
NCT Number: NCT06601179
Prostate adenoma, also known as benign prostatic hypertrophy or hyperplasia (BPH), involves an increase in the size of the prostate, forming a benign tumor. It is the most common benign tumor in men, generally affecting those over 40 years old. The risk of BPH is more than 50% in men aged 50 to 60 and rises to 90% in men by age 80.
This hyperplasia leads to altered urinary flow and bladder outlet obstruction, referred to as "lower urinary tract symptoms" or LUTS, which become more frequent with age. These symptoms are categorized as obstructive or irritative. In the early stages, men with BPH may have difficulty starting urination and may feel as if their bladder is not completely empty. As a result, they need to urinate more often, especially at night, a condition known as nocturia. Additionally, the volume and velocity of the urinary flow may decrease significantly, as evidenced by flow measurements, and residual urine discharge may occur at the end of urination.
High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a medical technique that uses high-intensity ultrasonic waves to treat various medical conditions, including malignant and benign tumors, without the need for invasive surgery or ionizing radiation. HIFU generates heat between 80° to 95°C at the focal point, causing necrosis of the targeted area with pinpoint accuracy. In urology, HIFU is used to treat prostate cancer in a minimally invasive manner, with focused ultrasounds delivered endorectally using a transducer that targets the treatment area with real-time monitoring.
Exclusively targeted HIFU treatment has been suggested for BPH, where localized necrosis of the side lobes reduces the volume of the prostatic transition zone, alleviating compression of the prostatic urethra and improving urinary symptoms.
This new study was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HIFU for BPH treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–85 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Clinique Saint Vincent, Besançon, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Men aged ≥ 50 to ≤ 85
Patient diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluated by:
Patient for whom medical treatment failed (having been taken regularly for more than 12 weeks) OR patient with a contraindication to the initiation of medical treatment OR patient refusing medical treatment Patient whose prostate show no sign of cancerous lesion confirmed by MRI Patient capable of reading and understanding French or with a carer who speaks French and could help the patient understand the leaflet and the questionnaires Patient registered with a social security scheme Patient having given their free and informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
Presence of a median lobe preventing the HIFU treatment to be delivered according to the investigator's judgment Prostate cancer confirmed or suspected History of surgical treatment of the prostate History of radiotherapy of the prostate History of bladder cancer History of urethral stricture Presence of a urinary tract fistula Urethral stricture or untreated bladder neck stenosis Untreated urinary lithiasis Neurological bladder or neurological bladder disease or any other neurological disease likely to affect the functioning of the bladder-sphincter system History of pelvic radiotherapy Patient with renal failure with GFR < 35ml/min Patient currently undergoing anticoagulant therapy (antivitamins K (AVK) and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for which the stop window cannot exceed 48H at the time of the HIFU procedure Contraindication to the surgical procedure, in particular anesthesia Contraindication to the pelvic MRI Patient with a rectal wall > 10mm
Contraindication to the HIFU treatment procedure:
high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Time frame: 3 months
Phase 1
Presence of significant cavitation that may be associated with adverse effects. Repeated urethral involvement that could damage the urethra. Absence of serious adverse effects (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) directly attributable to the HIFU treatment procedure at 3 months of follow-up.
Based on these elements, the scientific committee will analyze the cause-and-effect relationship between the indicators observed during treatment and the adverse effects.
Time frame: 3 months
Phase 1
Efficacy :
Efficacy will be considered satisfactory if at least two of the following three conditions are met:
Significant improvement in the maximum flow defined by Δ Qmax ≥ 50% of the initial flow or by a removal of the urinary catheter or supra-pubic catheter in included patients with urinary retention.
Improvement in obstructive and irritative symptoms 3 months after treatment, defined by a reduction in the IPSS score defined by Δ IPSS ≥30% Homogeneous necrosis observed on MRI
Time frame: 6 months
Phase 2
Efficacy of the treatment
To validate phase 2, 80% of patients are expected to meet the four evaluation criteria below after 6 months.
Evaluation of urinary symptoms, continence, the erectile function, postoperative complications using a composite "tetrafecta" score defined by 4 criteria:
Time frame: 36 months
Treatment safety 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months and 36 months after treatment will be evaluated by:
The rate of patients who experienced at least one adverse event with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III The rate of patients with an SAE linked to the procedure The rate of patients with an SAE linked to the MD The rate of patients with unscheduled consultation and/or secondary re-hospitalization due to problems in connection with the procedure or the MD
Time frame: 36 months
The impact of treatment on changes in prostate size will be evaluated by MRI and ultrasound 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment.
Time frame: 36 months
The impact of the HIFU treatment on the urinary flow will be evaluated by measuring Q max 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment defined by:
The rate of patient with ΔQmax ≥ 50% Rate of patients with removal of the urinary catheter after 3 months in included patients with urinary retention.
The rate of patients with Qmax ≥ 15 ml/s
Time frame: 36 months
The impact of the HIFU treatment on bladder voiding will be evaluated by measuring RPM 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after treatment, defined by:
The rate of patients with RPM ≤ 150 ml The rate of patients with Δ RPM ≥50%
Time frame: 36 months
The effect of the treatment on the obstructive and irritative symptoms of the lower urinary tract will be evaluated using the IPSS score 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months after treatment, defined by:
The rate of patients with Δ IPSS ≥30% The rate of patients with an IPSS score ≤ 7
Time frame: 36 months
The evaluation of the impact of the HIFU treatment on LUTS-related quality of life 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months after treatment, defined by:
The rate of patients with an IPSS-QoL score ≤ 2
Time frame: 36 months
The evaluation of the impact of treatment on the erectile function 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 36 months after treatment, defined by:
The rate of patients with a Δ IIEF score ≤ 5
Time frame: 36 months
The evaluation of the impact of treatment on the ejaculatory function 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 36 months after treatment, defined by:
The rate of patients with a Δ MSHQ-EjD score < 25 The rate of patients with MSHQ-EJD <10 (no ejaculatory dysfunction or mild dysfunction) The rate of patients who say they suffer from retrograde ejaculation
Time frame: 36 months
The recurrence rate over the follow-up period up to 36 months will be evaluated by the number of patients with urinary retention who required catheterization or surgery for BPH.
Time frame: 36 months
The estimation of costs related to the use of HIFU will be carried out by calculating the costs associated with consumables, the time of medical staff directly involved in the procedure, and the duration of hospitalization.
Time frame: 36 months
Efficiency will be estimated through the consideration of costs associated with HIFU treatment, follow-up costs, retreatments, and the duration of medical leave of absence.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
EDAP TMS S.A.
Industry
Phase 1-2 Dose-escalation Study, Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the "HIFU" High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia After 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 18 Months and 36 Months.
Acronym: BPH EFFICACY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07722884
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Efficacy
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07694752
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Genital Diseases
Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06511141
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06312722
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Genital Diseases
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details