Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06155968

Evaluating The Quality of Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section

Adequately validated patient-reported outcome measures are available, which can assess recovery profiles following childbirth. This study will explore the effect of two different methods for pain management on the quality of recovery of pregnant women undergoing cesarean section

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ain shams university

Cairo, 12245, Egypt

About this study

  • Type of Study: RCT
  • Study Setting: Obstetric theatre at Ain Shams University Hospital
  • Study Period :6 months

As per routine hospital practice, the pre-anesthetic assessment is performed, two 18 G peripheral cannula are inserted and 1 mg of granisetron and 50 mg of ranitidine are administered intravenously (IV) as premedications one hour before the operation, and 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution was infused for 15 minutes as a preload. All the study participants received a standard spinal anesthetic consisting of 10-12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.

The patients will be monitored using electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure measurement and pulse oximetry (SpO2). Spinal injection will be performed under aseptic technique in the sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral space using a 27-G Quincke needle.

The patients will be laid down in a supine position and oxygen therapy will be initiated at a rate of 6 L/min via a facemask throughout the procedure.

The level of sensory block will be confirmed using sensation to cold, the accepted level for initiation of the surgery will be at T4-5level.

The motor block will be monitored using Modified Bromage scale. The blood pressure, heart rate will be monitored. If the systolic blood pressure reduced to 20% below the baseline or less than 90 mmHg, 5 mg ephedrine was administered intravenously. Moreover, if the heart rate slowed to 50 beats/min or less, 0.5 mg atropine was administered intravenously.

After the completion of surgery, the sealed opaque envelope containing the group allocation was opened by the attending anaesthesia resident (who was not a part of the study) to decide the mode of analgesia the patient shall receive.

In group QL: The parturients will be positioned in left lateral decubitus position. The back is cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate solution and is draped with sterile drapes. The block is given using 21 G, 100 mm long (B Braun Stimuplex®A) insulated blunt tip needles. Patients will receive bilateral ultrasonography (USG) guided block with 20 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine on each side. The block is performed by anaesthesia consultants having experience of 5 years in ultrasound guided blocks. The procedure will be performed using aseptic technique (gown, gloves, facemask and protective sheath for the ultrasound probe).

The curvilinear probe (2 5 MHz, SonoSite Turbo M) is placed in the transverse axial plane just cranial to the iliac crest. The "shamrock sign" was visualised (viz., the transverse process (TP) of vertebra L4 is the stem, whereas the erector spinae muscle (ESM) posteriorly, quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle laterally and the psoas major (PM) muscle anteriorly represent the three leaves). The needle is introduced using an in plane technique from the posterior end of the transducer through the QL muscle. The target for injection is the fascial plane between the QL and PM muscles.

In the PCA group: the PCA pump will be connected in a separate cannula. The pump contains 0.5 mg nalbuphine/ ml. the basal rate is 5ml/h and lock out time is 10 min.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ΙΙ; and scheduled for elective cesarean section using a low transverse Pfannenstiel incision with spinal anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

  • (1) major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease; (2) local infection; (3) bleeding disorder; (4) any contraindication for spinal anesthesia; or (5) known allergy to any drug used in the study (6) refusal to participate in the study (7) BMI > 35 (8) had opioid dependence (9) chronic analgesic usage (10) inability to use patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

Treatment and study plan

QL block

Procedure

The curvilinear probe (2 5 MHz, SonoSite Turbo M) is placed in the transverse axial plane just cranial to the iliac crest. The "shamrock sign" was visualised (viz., the transverse process (TP) of vertebra L4 is the stem, whereas the erector spinae muscle (ESM) posteriorly, quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle laterally and the psoas major (PM) muscle anteriorly represent the three leaves). The needle is introduced using an in plane technique from the posterior end of the transducer through the QL muscle. The target for injection is the fascial plane between the QL and PM muscles..

PCA

Drug

the PCA pump will be connected in a separate cannula. The pump contains 0.5 mg nalbuphine/ ml. the basal rate is 5ml/h and lock out time is 10 min

Primary outcomes

  1. ObsQor-10 score

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperative

    compare the total ObsQor-10 score in both groups to determine which pain management intervention yields a better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. validation of ObsQoR-10

    Time frame: 24 hours

    psychometric validation of the ObsQoR-10 score in a subset of Egyptian women undergoing elective cesarean section.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating The Quality of Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section Using ObsQoR-10, A Comparative Study Between Two Modalities for Pain Control.

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 5, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.