Behavioural Medicine Lab UVic
Victoria, British Columbia, V8p5C2, Canada
NCT Number: NCT05738109
1. Does a 91-day self-talk journal intervention improve outcomes of self-criticism, self-esteem, automatic negative self-statements, and mental health among participants using the journal over wait-list control? 2. What is the adherence rate to a 91-day self-talk journal intervention? 3. What were participants' experience(s) of using a 91-day self-talk journal?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Victoria, British Columbia, V8p5C2, Canada
The following research project can contribute to the investigators' understanding of how/how well self-guided resources can increase participant outcomes of self-criticism, self-esteem, automatic negative self-statements, and mental health. Self-guided resources such as a self-talk journal provide can provide an easily accessible avenue for improving individual mental health. There has been a recent surge in the popularity of health-promotive self-care products, or products aimed at providing individuals with "the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to achieve and maintain good health". These products (often in the form of journals) are similar to "self-help books"; however, a key difference is that self-care products prompt and provide space for the reader to actively engage in activities and psychological techniques, unlike the passive nature of traditional self-help books. These products typically address mental health concerns (i.e., mental health self-care) and are advertised to provide an effective means for individuals to reduce stress, improve self-compassion, and boost wellbeing. What's more, the generally positive reviews these products garner provides the perception that these products are well-received and effective in eliciting these outcomes. However, the scientific foundation for the majority of these journals is unknown. Furthermore, the efficacy of these products for improving or promoting their intended outcome(s) is often not addressed outside of these, often positive, reviews.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(1) being 19+ years old, (2) being fluent in English, (3) currently living in the Greater Victoria area, (4) self-reporting no previously diagnosed mental illness or psychiatric conditions, and (5) scoring >12 on the Self-Criticism subscale of the Self-Talk Scale (based on previous mean data; Brinthaupt, Hein, & Kramer, 2009).
Exclusion criteria
Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a physical copy of the 91-day self-talk journal during the baseline meeting. Participants will also be introduced the purpose of the journal and its intended usage (i.e., daily journaling). Intervention participants will not be offered guidance or feedback on the journal after these initial instructions, in order to emulate an ad libitum usage. Control group participants will not receive any contact with the researchers outside of the planned questionnaires and to receive their journal at the three-month timepoint.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Assessed using the Self-Talk Scale. The scale consists of 16 items rated on a five-point frequency scale (1 = never, 5 = very often) using the common stem "I talk to myself when…"
It has a four factor-structure comprised of self-assessment, self-reinforcement, self-criticism and self-management.
Total scores range from 16-80. Individual subscales scores range from 16-20. The higher the score the greater frequency of one's self-talk.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, a 10-item measure of global self-esteem or self-worth.
Uses a 4-point likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree)
Possible scores range from 10-40, higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Aspects of self-consciousness, including private self-consciousness, internal state awareness, self-reflection, public self-consciousness, and social anxiety, will be assessed using the Fenigstein Self-Consciousness Scale.
The scale consists of 23 items, rated using a 5-point likert scale ranging from 0 (extremely uncharacteristic) to 4 (extremely characteristic), with higher scores denoting higher levels of self-consciousness.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
The frequency of automatic negative self-statements will be assessed using the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, whose 30-items assess the frequency of negative self-statements associated with depression.
Uses a 5-point likert scale comprised of the following: 1 = not at all, 2 = sometimes, 3 = moderately often, 4 = often , and 5 = all of the time. Possible scores range from 30-150, with higher scores indicating greater rates of negative self-statements.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Adherence to the journal for the intervention group will be assessed using three items:
Time frame: At 3 months from baseline or if and when intervention participants drop out of the study
Intervention group participants' experience using the journal will be assessed through a qualitative exit interview
Time frame: Baseline
Age, preferred gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity, educational attainment, and employment status will be collected
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Depression and anxiety will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Possible scores for each subscale range from 0-21. A score of 0-7 = "normal", 8-10 = "Borderline abnormal (borderline case)" and 11-21 = "Abnormal (case)."
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Subjective well-being will be assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale.
Uses a 5-point Likert scale: 1= none of the time, 2= rarely, 3 = some of the time, 4 = often, and 5 = all of the time. Possible scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater mental-wellbeing
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, 1 month , 2 months, and 3 months for all participants. As well as 4 months for intervention participants
Modified International Physical Activity Questionnaire includes open-ended questions surrounding individuals':
University of Victoria
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07289594
Behavior, Mental Health
Beirut, Lebanon
View Trial DetailsNCT07066696
Academic Performance, Behavior
Zaragoza, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04398407
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04677647
Behavior, Mental Health
New York, United States
View Trial Details