Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07733427

Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer

The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of intratracheal analgesia on pain intensity in cancer patients, from the start of treatment up to 3 months. It will also investigate the safety of this technique. The main questions it seeks to answer are as follows:

What is the impact on the use of opioid analgesics, and can this be measured? What is the quality of life? What is the quality of sleep, and can this be assessed? How does the patient's weight change? Is the patient satisfied? What is the patient's overall survival?

The researchers will assess the equivalent daily dose of morphine (mg/day) between enrolment and follow-up visits, as well as the number of patients requiring an escalation of analgesic treatment. Overall quality of life score measured using the ESAS questionnaire between enrolment and follow-up visits; satisfaction assessed using a numerical satisfaction scale (0-10); sleep quality assessed using the ISI questionnaire; and the tolerability and safety of the technique assessed by monitoring adverse events.

Eligible participants:

Following implantation of the intrathecal pump, participants will have scheduled consultations at day 30, then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, with questionnaires to be completed.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Benkessou, Paris, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Subject aged over 20 years

  • Patient with histologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma
  • Chronic cancer-related pain that is inadequately controlled by standard treatment or for whom analgesics are contraindicated.
  • EMO < 120 mg/day Patients experiencing side effects: sedation, vomiting, constipation, or an allergy to morphine.
  • Signed informed consent
  • Participants affiliated with or eligible for a social security scheme
  • Agree to complete the various study questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Patients under the age of 20.

  • Contraindications to intratracheal analgesia
  • Acute respiratory infection
  • Uncontrolled coagulation disorder
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Unable to comply with medical follow-up for the study.
  • Adults who are legally protected, under guardianship or under a conservatorship

Treatment and study plan

Intrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump

Device

Epidural puncture (AL injection), followed by a lumbar puncture and collection of cerebrospinal fluid. Positioning of the catheter behind the spinal cord at the desired metameric level for the pancreas (T5-T7), and positioning of the pump in the flank or buttock.

Administration of medication, including analgesics, via an intrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump or via periodic injections

Drug

Medications are administered via an intrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump or via periodic injections; the patient is admitted to hospital with morphine (IV, PO, transdermal) discontinued on entry to the unit (the same applies to methadone). Depending on the condition of the patient's abdominal skin (stoma, multiple injections, etc.) and any foreseeable technical difficulties during MRI scanning (in the left or right lateral positions), the procedure is performed under fluoroscopy, with appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, under local anaesthesia, epidural anaesthesia and light sedation. Product used, dosage and frequency:

Opioids: μ and δ receptors: Morphine sulphate: 50 mg/ml Ca++ channels: ziconotide: initial dose 0.5 µg/day Sodium channels: 1% ropivacaine As with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system: Continuous infusion + bolus or sequential boluses Patient education on the use of the pump during their hospital stay.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) - Pain Subscore

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Change in pain intensity score measured by the ESAS subscale from baseline to follow-up visits.

    Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0 to 10) Scale Range (Minimum and Maximum Values): 0 to 10

    Direction of Scores: Higher scores mean a worse outcome (greater pain intensity).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Overall Quality of Life Score

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Change in overall score as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) from baseline to follow-up visits.

    Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (ESAS Score) Scale Range (Minimum and Maximum Values): 0 to 10

    Direction of Scores: Higher scores mean a worse outcome (greater pain intensity).

  2. Proportion of Patients Requiring Pain Treatment Escalation

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Number of patients requiring an increase or escalation in pain management treatment during follow-up.

    Unit of Measure: Number of participants (or Percentage)

  3. Change in Daily Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED)

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Change in daily opioid dose from baseline to follow-up visits.

    Unit of Measure: mg/day

  4. Change in Sleep Quality Score Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Change in insomnia severity measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire from baseline to follow-up visits.

    Scale Range (Minimum and Maximum Values): 0 to 28 (Derived from summing the 7 individual items, each scored on a 0 to 4 scale evaluating sleep onset, maintenance, early morning awakening, satisfaction, daytime interference, noticeability, and distress)

    Direction of Scores: Higher score 4 means a worse outcome (greater insomnia severity and impaired quality of life)

    Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (ISI Score)

  5. Change in Body Weight

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Change in body weight from baseline to follow-up visits.

    Unit of Measure: Kilograms (kg)

  6. Patient Satisfaction Clinical Global Impressions Scale (typically either CGI-Severity or CGI-Improvement)

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Overall patient satisfaction Clinical Global Impressions (typically either CGI-Severity or CGI-Improvement) rated on a numerical scale.

    Unit of Measure: Score on a scale

    Scale Range (Minimum and Maximum Values): 1 to 7

    Direction of Scores: Higher scores mean a worse outcome (e.g., greater illness severity or worsening condition).

  7. Incidence of Adverse Events Related to Intratracheal Analgesia

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event related to the intratracheal analgesia technique.

    Unit of Measure: Number of participants

  8. Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Telephone call between Week 1 and Week 12, and questionnaires at Day 30, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

    Number of participants experiencing a serious adverse event during the study period.

    Unit of Measure: Number of participants

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Bouchra BENKESSOU Chef de projet Recherche Clinique

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 7 64 48 60 16

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Clinique Bizet

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Pilot Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer

Acronym: PIT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 31, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.