Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000, China
NCT Number: NCT05308511
The trial is a prospective,multi-center, randomized and self-controlled clinical trial. The research plan will be implemented in a clinical trial center with the qualification of clinical trial agency, and 128 subjects will be planned to be included. Subjects signing the Informed Consent Form, meeting the trial conditions and all inclusion criteria and failing to meet any exclusion criteria will be included in the research. The trial device was Colon Capsule Endoscope System for colonoscopy(PC-I) manufactured by ANKON Technologies Co.,Ltd. while the comparator device was Capsule Endoscopy System(PillCam COLON2) manufactured by Given Imaging Inc. The main evaluation indicator is the excellent rate of image quality, while secondary evaluation indicators are the consistency rate of lesion detection, completion rate of colonoscopy, discharge time of capsule endoscopy, colon passing time and device performance evaluation. Safety evaluation indicators include adverse events(or Serious adverse events), device-related adverse events(or Serious adverse events) and device defects. In the end, the effectiveness and safety of Colon Capsule Endoscopy diagnostic system manufactured by ANKON Technologies Co.,Ltd. for capturing and viewing colon images clinically were verified according to the above indicator results.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000, China
According to the relevant requirements of Standard for Quality Management of Medical Device Clinical Trials (Order No. 25 of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China of China Food and Drug Administration), the sample size was estimated based on the excellent rate of the image quality of the main endpoint by referring to the domestic and foreign literatures using positive comparator devices. Combined with literatures and comments of clinical experts, the research set the excellent rate of image quality of comparator device Ps as 95%, and estimated the excellent rate of image quality of trial device Pt as 95%. In the research, the non-inferiority trial design was adopted, with α = 0.025 (unilateral), assurance 1 - β = 0.8, and non-inferiority boundary value of -10%, and self-control was adopted. It is assumed that the redundant parameter (that is, the proportion of subjects whose evaluation results of image quality between trial devices and comparator devices are inconsistent) was 0.095 (that is, Pt (1 - Ps) + Ps (1 - Pt)), the total sample size of the two groups was 102 cases calculated by PASS2021, with 51 cases in each swallowing orders I and II. Considering the shedding and rejection rate of 20% during the trial, a total of 128 subjects were needed, with 64 cases in each swallowing orders I and II.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
First swallow the trial device(PC-I) for examination, and then swallow the comparator device(COLON2) for examination at an interval of 2h.
First swallow the comparator device(COLON2) for examination, and then swallow the trial device(PC-I) for examination at an interval of 2h.
Time frame: 1 day
The main effectiveness evaluation indicator is the excellent rate of image quality, which is for the statistics of the difference between the excellent rate of image quality of trial devices and comparator devices and unilateral 97.5% confidence interval. If the lower limit of unilateral 97.5% confidence interval of the difference between the two groups is greater than -10% of the non-inferiority boundary value, it can be considered that the excellent rate of image quality of trial devices is not inferior to that of comparator devices.
Time frame: 1 day
2 associate chief physicians of digestive endoscopy or attending physicians with more than 5 years of endoscopic experience adopted independent film reading in the center for recording of the lesion detection in the image through back-to-back interpretation and analysis. Then record the number of lesions detected consistently.
Time frame: 1-14 days
Colonoscopy is completed before the battery runs out, and the capsule endoscopy captures the rectal segment image or the image that the capsule endoscopy is discharged from the body.
Time frame: 1-14 days
The discharge time of the capsule endoscopy is from swallowing capsule endoscopy to discharging capsule endoscopy.
Time frame: 0.5-10hours
Colon passing time is from the capsule endoscopy's arrival at the ileocecal valve to the capsule endoscopy's discharge from the body.
Time frame: 1day
Subjective evaluation of the performance of the trial and control devices.
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Other
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized and Self-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Colon Capsule Endoscope System for Capturing and Viewing Colon Images Clinically
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07380815
Behavior, Lung Diseases
Vejle, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04598841
Colonic Diseases, Congenital Abnormalities
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05705336
Evidence-based Medicine, Prospective Study
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT07243561
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD
Dongfang, Hainan, China
View Trial Details