Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03076918

Evaluating the Device FLEXITHERALIGHT Compared to the Conventional Photodynamic Therapy

This study compares the efficacy and tolerance of a new device (FLEXITHERALIGHT) for photodynamic therapy in the treatment of keratosis actinic in comparison of classical PDT with Aktilite®.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHRU, Hôpital Claude Huriez

Lille, France

About this study

The study is an intraindividual comparison of two methods. The number of subjects to be enrolled is 47 patients. All participants will receive both two treatments in a single visit : a first period of 2.5 hours of illumination with FLEXITHERALIGHT device followed by a continuous red light Spectrum (between 7 and 10 minutes) with Aktilite® after an appropriate incubation of methyl aminolevulinate).

Patients will complete a pain assessment scale after receiving both treatments, then, 3 follow up visits will be scheduled.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of minimum 10 previously untreated not pigmented, non-hyperkeratotic AK lesions of Grade I and II of the forehead and/or scalp (according to Olsen et Al. JAAD 1991, cf. REF 31) where other therapies are unacceptable or considered medically less appropriate with a symmetrical repartition on both side of the forehead and/or scalp. The diagnosis of AK will be determined upon clinical evaluation (i.e. visual inspection and palpation) by the investigator.
  • Symmetrical areas in terms of number and severity of lesions. The axis of symmetry between the two areas will be defined by the investigator according to the distribution of lesions.
  • The two areas to be treated should not be coalescing. A minimum distance of 10mm is required between the lesions located on the 2 symmetrical areas. A minimum distance of 2 mm is required between the lesions on the same side.
  • Minimum 5 lesions with similar dimensions at both symmetrical areas will be treated. If the number of lesions is >7, only 7 lesions on each side will be considered.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with porphyria.
  • Patients immunosuppressed for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons.
  • Use of topical corticosteroids to lesional areas within 2 weeks before PDT.
  • Patients receiving local treatment (including cryotherapy and curettage, any - Patients receiving topical treatment (including imiquimod, 5-FU and diclofenac, Picato) in face / scalp area within the last 3 months.
  • Use of topical retinoids or alpha-hydroxy acids, urea or systemic retinoids, chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 4 weeks of PDT.
  • Pigmented AK lesion(s).
  • Known allergy to Metvixia, a similar PDT compound or excipients of the cream including arachis oil, or to peanut or soya.
  • Participation in other clinical studies either currently or within the last 30 days.
  • Female subjects must be of either:

Non-childbearing potential, i.e. post-menopausal or have a confirmed clinical history of sterility (e.g. the subject is without a uterus) or, Childbearing potential, provided there is a confirmed negative urine pregnancy test prior to study treatment, to rule out pregnancy.

  • Any condition which may be associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.
  • Patients currently receiving regular ultraviolet radiation therapy

Treatment and study plan

FLEXITHERALIGHT PDT

Device

Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 30 minutes+illumination 2.5 hours

Aktilite® Galderma

Device

Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 3 hours+illumination 7 to 10 minutes

Other names: Conventional PDT

Primary outcomes

  1. Treated lesion response rate

    Time frame: up to month 6

    Each treatment area will be counted, graded with Clinical grade of AK, mapped and photographed

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog scale of pain

    Time frame: Day 1 and D ay 7.

    Measure the pain and local tolerance graduation range 0 to 10

  2. Scale for clinical assessment of the subject's skin aspect

    Time frame: Months 3 and Months 6

    4-point scale that ranged of Excellent; No scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin. Good: No scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin, Fair: Slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration, Poor: Extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration

  3. Fluorescence measure of the PpIX

    Time frame: Baseline, after 3 hours of incubation, in case of treatment interruption, immediately after the treatment, and at 15 and 30 minutes after the end of the treatment.

    Measures with Fluoderm photometer

  4. Irradiance measure in mW/cm2 for each AK

    Time frame: during Aktilite® treatment at Day 1

    Measures realised with a wattmeter OPHIR LaserSTAR to know the power of light delivered

  5. Rate of patients with at least 75% of reduction of the lesions

    Time frame: Months 3 and Months 6

    The reduction in the number of lesions will be calculated as a function of the initial number:≥4 destroyed if 5 lésions; ≥ 5 destroyed if 6 lésions and ≥6 destroyed if 7 lesions

    ≥4 destroyed if 5 lesions

  6. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    Time frame: At Day 7, Months 3 and Months 6

    The questionnaire of 10 questions is completed by the patient to evaluate his quality of life

  7. Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Time frame: At Day 7, Months 3 and Months 6

    The questionnaire es created by the investigator to evaluate the comfort of the device. Patient will give his overall satisfaction and the will answer 7 questions on a 5-point scale that ranged from Not embarrassing, few embarrassing, embarrassing, Very embarrassing, I Don't know

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille

Other

Collaborators

  • Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
  • National Research Agency, France

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Non-inferiority of the Device FLEXITHERALIGHT Compared to the Conventional Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

Acronym: Flexithera

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 10, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.