Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224-9980, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Cancer Center Clinical Trials Team
CONTACT
Clinical Trials Referral Office
CONTACT
Roxana S. Dronca, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07073794
This phase II trial evaluates the impact of cancer therapy in the patients' home compared to in the clinic on safety, side effects, patient preference, and satisfaction in Black men with prostate cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced), that has increasing prostate-specific antigen after treatment (biochemically recurrent) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Typically drug-related cancer care is conducted at a medical center which causes patients to have to spend considerable time away from family, friends, and familiar surroundings. This separation may add to the physical, emotional, social, and financial burden for patients and their families during this difficult time in their lives. Therapy administered to a patient in the patients' residence in the comfort of familiar surrounding using Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise (CARE) Beyond Walls (CCBW) may help reduce psychological and financial distress, increase access to care and improve treatment compliance. Giving cancer therapy in the home compared in the clinic may be safe, tolerable and improve patient satisfaction with overall cancer care in Black men with locally advanced, biochemically recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224-9980, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Cancer Center Clinical Trials Team
CONTACT
Clinical Trials Referral Office
CONTACT
Roxana S. Dronca, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To establish patient-centeredness by comparing patient ratings of their overall cancer care experience in the clinic versus in the home.
II. To establish patient-centeredness by evaluating patient preferences regarding the location of cancer treatment delivery.
SAFETY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the safety of home administered intravenous (IV)/subcutaneous (SQ) drug treatment by a home health provider with remote patient monitoring and Command Center support as measured by the incidence of grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related to cancer treatment delivery.
II. To describe the incidence of acute care visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations during the entire study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery (i.e., during in-clinic cancer treatment versus at-home cancer treatment).
III. To describe the incidence of avoidable (in the opinion of the treating physician) acute care visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations during at-home cancer treatment.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the impact of home cancer treatment delivery on patient-reported function and global health/quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To summarize patient perceptions and reasons for patient preferences regarding the location of cancer treatment delivery.
II. To describe overall survival. III. To assess the cost outcomes related to patient treatment in the clinic or in the home.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive standard of care treatment in the clinic for 6-12 weeks then receive treatment in the home with CCBW for 12-24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients receive any remaining treatment in the clinic.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given standard of care cancer treatment in clinic
Other names: anticancer therapy, Cancer Therapy, Cancer Treatment, Malignant Neoplasm Therapy, Malignant Neoplasm Treatment
Receive in home cancer treatment with CCBW
Other names: Care Delivery, Health Services Delivery, Other, Healthcare Delivery
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Patient rating of their overall cancer care experience after 12 weeks of at-home cancer treatment will be compared to the same rating after 6 or 12 weeks of in-clinic cancer treatment. Will be assessed using patient ratings from a single item from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (CAHPS). Participants will rate "your overall cancer care experience" on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is the worst experience possible and 10 is the best experience possible.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Will be assessed by a single item asking patients to rate their preferred location for cancer treatment delivery on a 1 to 7 scale: 1=strongly prefer in clinic, 2=moderately prefer in clinic, 3=slightly prefer in clinic, 4=no preference, 5=slightly prefer at home, 6=moderately prefer at home, 7=strongly prefer at home.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Incidence, type, and severity of AEs experienced during the study period will be reported. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be summarized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. For individual adverse events and overall, the frequency and proportion of grade 3+ adverse events and grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related to cancer treatment delivery will be reported for the entire study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery (i.e., in clinic versus at home).
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
The frequency and proportion of patients who experience an acute care visit, emergency room visit, or hospitalization will be reported for the entire study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery (i.e., during in clinic cancer treatment versus at-home cancer treatment).
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
The frequency and proportion of patients who experience an avoidable acute care visit, emergency room visit, or hospitalization while receiving at-home cancer treatment will be reported. Whether an acute care visit, emergency room visit, or hospitalization could have been avoided from changing the location of cancer treatment delivery will be in the opinion of the treating physician.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Will be measured by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Functioning 17 (QLQ-F17), scored following its published scoring algorithm. Higher scores indicate better quality of life
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
PRO-CTCAE uses a 0-4 scoring system for most items, with 0 representing the absence of a symptom or no impact, and 4 representing the highest severity or impact. Some items, specifically those assessing presence, use a 0/1 (absent/present) scale. The frequency and proportion of patients with a maximum baseline-adjusted composite score ≥ 3 during the study treatment period and by location of cancer treatment delivery will be reported.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks.
The FACT GP5 consists of a single question, "I am bothered by side effects of treatment," rated on a scale of 0-4 where 0=not at all and 4=very much.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Patient satisfaction will be measured by the Patient Satisfaction and Feedback Questionnaire (specific to this study). The questionnaire consists of 30 questions evaluating different aspects of care, including level of care (excellent, very good, good, faire poor), preference for location of care (at home vs in clinic), comparison of care at home vs in clinic (strongly agree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, strongly agree), communication received from care team (0-10 where 0=worst communication possible and 10=best communication possible), transition to care at home and use of at-home equipment (very easy, easy, neither, difficult, very difficult). Patient responses will be summarized descriptively.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks
Will be measured by the Was It Worth It Questionnaire, which consists of 3 questions answered with yes/no/undecided, two questions answered on a e-point scale (better, same, worse), and one open-ended question (one things that could have been done to improve patient experience). Patient responses will be summarized descriptively.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Mayo Clinic
Other
A Phase 2 Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Evaluate Administration of Cancer Therapy in the Patients' Homes Versus in Clinic in Black Men With Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06205316
Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Genital Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04447703
Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Genital Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04050215
Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Genital Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04423211
Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Genital Diseases
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial Details