Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT03663244
The aim was to assess the feasibility and to improve the quality of a definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) with the purpose to investigate the effectiveness of stress reduction programmes in the community. (A definitive RCT = an RCT with statistical power). Intermediate aims: to investigate 1) the potential generalizability: the accept among the target population (people with perceived stress) of participating in an RCT, including a description of the participant characteristics and the recruitment time ; 2) the risk of intervention effect dilution: the accept of allocated intervention in terms of programme completion ; 3) the risk of contamination: potential participation in (other) stress reduction treatment beyond the allocated intervention or non-intervention ; 4) the risk of selection problems or -bias: the lost to follow-up in the trial arms ; and finally, 5) the risk of information problems: the accept among participants of chosen outcome measurements, sensitivity of chosen outcome measures to detect effects, and indications of potential effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standardised stress reduction programme with established efficacy
Existing stress reduction programme in a Danish municipality
Time frame: over 4 months
Accept among total target group
Time frame: over 8 weeks
Accept of the MBSR and the LSR programme defined by participation in >4 meetings
Time frame: over 8 weeks
Risk of dilution of intervention effects. Proportions of allocated participants that have participated in other stress reduction treatment during the trial
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Risk of selection bias. Proportions of allocated participants lost to follow-up
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Symptom check list_5
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: WHO_5
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Brief Resiliens Scale
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Amsterdam Resting State Questionnaire
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Neffs Self-Compassion-Scale
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: Decentring scale
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: systolic blood pressure
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: diastolic blood pressure
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: weight
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: waist
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: TOVA-test
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: S-cholesterol
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: C-Reaktivt Protein
Time frame: twice over 8-10 weeks
Proportions without missings in: inflammationmarker IL-6
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences between groups at 8-week follow
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow adjusted for baseline-value and adjusted for baseline-value, age, sex, educational level and history of mental disorder
Time frame: over 8-10 weeks
Plasma (µmol/L). Differences with 95% Confidence intervals between groups at 8-week follow
University of Aarhus
Other
Is High Quality Effectiveness Research on Effective Stress Reduction in the Community Possible? -a Three-armed Parallel Pilot Trial in a Danish Municipality
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05567913
Behavior, Personal Satisfaction
Ed, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06391216
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Lodz, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05059392
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT05930652
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Krakow, Poland
View Trial Details