Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00592904

Evaluating E2007 (Perampanel) in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and continued efficacy of perampanel in patients previously enrolled in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Chicago, Illinois, 60610, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Each patient must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled in this study:

  • Met and continues to meet all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria for the preceding PDN or PHN study and received study drug or placebo under double-blind conditions.
  • Completed the preceding double-blind study End of Treatment (EOT) Visit no more than 12 weeks prior to Baseline (Visit 1) for the open-label study. The eligibility status of patients who do not enroll during this 12 week period will be evaluated on a case by case basis via discussion between the Investigator and the Sponsor.
  • Males and females ≥18 years of age. Female patients should be either of nonchildbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device [IUD]) for at least 1 month before the Baseline Visit (Visit 1) and for 1 month after the end of the study (Visit 16). They must also have a negative pregnancy test at Baseline (Visit 1). Female patients using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD) throughout the study.
  • Provide written informed consent prior to entering the study and prior to undergoing any study-related procedures.
  • Is reliable, willing, and able to cooperate with the study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet the following criterion will be excluded from this study:

  • Patients who discontinued early for any reason from the preceding double-blind study.
  • Patients who have a clinically significant finding(s) that would make them unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the investigator or Sponsor.

Treatment and study plan

E2007

Drug

Perampanel doses will be up-titrated in 2 mg steps at minimum weekly intervals starting at 2 mg daily and up-titrated to 12 mg daily (taken orally).

Other names: Perampanel

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ): Sensory and Affective Scores, From Baseline to Week 48.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

    Mean change from baseline to open-label study endpoint and other study visits in SF-MPQ scores sensory and affective). SF-MPQ was completed to assess intensity of pain over the past 48 days for all 15 descriptors: throbbing, shooting, stabbing, sharp, cramping, gnawing, hot-burning, aching, heavy, tender, splitting,tiring-exhausting, sickening, fear-causing, punishing-cruel. Each descriptor was scored by participant on a 4-point intensity scale (0=none to 3=severe) and totaled in each subclass (sensory range 0-45); higher scores indicated higher intensity of pain.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): From Baseline to Week 48.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

    SF-MPQ VAS consists of a line 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) in length; range is 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). Subjects placed a mark indicating the intensity of their pain. Distance from left-hand end of line was measured and entered on Case Report Form (CRF) as score in mm. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in SF-MPQ Current Pain Intensity (CPI): From Baseline to Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

    Mean change from baseline in SF-MPQ (CPI) at study endpoint. Affective score ranges from 0-5. Higher scores indicate more severe pain (0=no pain, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible, 5=excrutiating).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 48/End of Treatment (EOT)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

    The PGIC asked subjects to evaluate the change in their overall status compared with the start of open-label treatment on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). [Please note high withdrawl rate during study].

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Item (SF-36) Health Survey: Physical and Mental Component Scores From Baseline to Week 48/EOT

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 48

    Mean change from baseline in SF-36 Item Health Survey Scores at study endpoint. Each component on the SF-36 Item Health Survey is scored from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting better subject status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eisai Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-Center, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of E2007 (Perampanel) in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2011
First posted
Jan 14, 2008
Registry last updated
Jan 21, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.