Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07105397

Evaluating Conversational Artificial Intelligence for Depression Management

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate how a conversational method of collecting medical history affects patients' perceptions and experiences compared to clinical care as usual. This conversational AI intake system collects medical history information, can be completed by participants at home, and do not disrupt routine clinical care.

The primary questions this study aims to answer are:

1) Does conversational intake affect patients' perceptions of empathy during their clinical interactions?

This will be a prospective study that follows a cohort of participants for four (4) months after engaging with the AI intake system. Because each participant serves as his/her own control, both comparators will be administered within-subject, and the order of exposure (AI intake vs. usual care) will be randomized to minimize sequence effects.

After completing the AI intake method, participants will rate their experience, particularly in terms of empathy and compare it to their usual interactions with their own clinicians.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

George Mason University

Fairfax, Virginia, 22030, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Farrokh Alemi, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

7579459484

Farrokh Alemi, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kevin Lybarger, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

7579459484

Kevin Lybarger, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) systems, such as those based on Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, offer innovative ways to engage patients in health-related conversations. Despite these advances, challenges remain regarding patient safety and system reliability. Specific concerns include biased recommendations against certain patient groups, inaccuracies or misleading responses, and mechanical, unempathic interactions, particularly during sensitive moments such as when patients express suicidal thoughts. Testing conversational AI in healthcare settings is complicated due to the diverse medical, linguistic, and behavioral characteristics exhibited by patients.

This study addresses these challenges by developing an advanced conversational AI system guided by a structured knowledge-based topic network to maintain conversation relevance and coherence. Additionally, the investigators introduce a novel patient simulator methodology that mimics diverse medical histories, linguistic styles, and behavioral interactions, enhancing pre-clinical testing rigor.

The research focuses specifically on the clinical context of depression management, aiming to optimize antidepressant selection. Currently, many patients undergo a frustrating and costly trial-and-error process to find effective antidepressants. The study compares two approaches and their impact on a patient's perceptions of empathy:

  • Conversational AI Intake: Engages patients through flexible, open-ended dialogue to gather medical history and generate personalized antidepressant recommendations.
  • Usual Care: Reflects the physician's clinical judgment about how to best treat the depressive disorder, including the severity level at which treatment is required.

The conversational AI intake system leverage a curated, evidence-based knowledgebase of 15 commonly used antidepressants, considering factors like patient age, gender, comorbidities, and previous antidepressant use. The accuracy and completeness of the AI-generated recommendations are rigorously verified in by clinicians prior to any medication changes, adhering to FDA safety requirements.

This will be a prospective study that follows a cohort of participants for four (4) months after engaging with the AI intake system. A primary goal of the project is to evaluate how conversational AI impacts patient-centered outcomes, specifically patient perceptions of empathy and communication quality. Patients with major depressive disorder will be recruited online, enhancing participant diversity and representativeness. Because each participant serves as his/her own control, both comparators will be administered within-subject, and the order of exposure (AI intake vs. usual care) will be randomized to minimize sequence effects. Outcomes will include differences in data completeness and patient perceptions of empathy. To ensure that the AI conversation is evaluated against the best of usual care, we will select the highest empathy score achieved across multiple visits as the usual care comparator.

Beyond immediate clinical outcomes, the project's methodological advancements, particularly the development of robust, bias-mitigated conversational systems and comprehensive patient simulation for AI testing, will have broad applicability across healthcare domains. The conversational AI and patient simulator will be made publicly available at no cost, providing tools that other researchers, clinicians, and healthcare providers can utilize and adapt to various health contexts.

Patient and stakeholder engagement is integral to the study. A representative advisory board, including patients with lived experience of depression, clinicians, mental health advocates, and researchers, guides all phases of the project. This collaborative framework ensures that the research remains patient-centered and responsive to real-world clinical needs and experiences.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • Participant is between 18 to 85 years old.
  • Participant has been, or are likely to be, diagnosed with moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder without signs of bipolar depression.
  • Participant is not in active suicidal crisis and do not face imminent risk of suicide within the next 3 hours.
  • Participant is not pregnant or seeking to be pregnant.
  • Participant able to communicate in English on the Internet.
  • Participant must reside in the United States.
  • Participant has access to a mental health clinician, or the participant is willing to see study clinicians to help review the advice and medication adjustments recommended by the AI Intake System to the participant.
  • If the participant is seeing study clinicians, the participant must reside in a state where study clinicians are licensed.
  • Participant must be using a device (phone or computer) that is located in the United States.

Treatment and study plan

Conversational AI system vs Usual Care

Other

Participants complete medical history intake through an interactive conversational AI designed to support patient-centered, empathetic dialogue. Using large language models (LLM), the system interprets patient input, maintains context, and generates natural-language responses. A dialogue manager prioritizes medically relevant topics to support efficient data collection and reduce off-topic discussion. For safety, trained human monitors oversee conversations in real time and can intervene if risks such as self-harm arise. The AI intake is compared with patients' experiences with their clinicians through monthly follow-up questionnaires over four months. The study evaluates patients' ratings of empathy, communication quality, and engagement, not conversation content. Each participant serves as their own control, with AI intake and usual care compared within-subject and randomized by order of exposure.

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceptions of empathy

    Time frame: From enrollment up to 4 months after participation

    The primary outcome assesses the impact of intake methods (conversational AI vs. structured survey) on patients' perceptions of empathy. Patient empathy perceptions will be measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), a validated instrument. A higher JSE score means higher perceptions of empathy. We hypothesize that patients interacting with the conversational AI will report higher perceived empathy scores compared to those using the structured survey. For evaluation of impact of comparators, the primary analysis will focus on impact of LLM and clinician encounters on patient perceived empathy. These data will be analyzed using paired comparisons (ANOVA), with randomized order of exposure accounted for in the design. At the power of 0.80, a small-to medium effect size (d = 0.3), and significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 90 participants is needed, with 112 participants needed with attrition. In order to support higher power, a total of 130 participants will be recruited.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Communication Accommodation

    Time frame: From enrollment up to 4 months after participation

    The study team will assess communication accommodation to determine whether the conversational AI meets patient needs through a content analysis of conversation transcripts. This analysis will rate three key dimensions: empathy, communication quality, and effectiveness. Codes for each are drawn from validated, widely used scales. From this, the study team will generate composite scores to classify AI conversations as high or low in each dimension and overall. To validate the findings, the study team will compare content analysis scores with patient self-reports on perceived levels (high or low) of empathy, quality, and effectiveness. Together, these data will provide a robust evaluation of the AI's communication accommodation.

  2. Adherence to recommendations

    Time frame: From enrollment up to 4 months after participation

    Adherence to the recommendations provided by the conversational AI will be evaluated approximately one month after patient participation. Follow-up includes a structured questionnaire and brief interview, where patients report (1) if they discussed system-generated recommendations with their clinician, and (2) their current medications by direct reference to medication containers. Collected data will allow classification of clinician prescriptions as either concordant or discordant with system-generated recommendations, facilitating evaluation of adherence behaviors.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Farrokh Alemi, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

7579459484

Kevin Lybarger, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

7579459484

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

George Mason University

Other

Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.