Evaluating a Digital Intervention to Improve Adolescent Condom Use and Communication

Participants' likelihood of using a condom during sexual intercourse with a partner

Participants' likelihood of 1) ensuring consent is obtained from a partner prior to sexual intercourse and 2) communicating their consent affirmatively to a partner prior to intercourse

Participants' confidence in their ability to assert their desire to use a condom with a partner (5-point likert, strongly disagree to strongly agree, higher scores = higher self-efficacy)

Participants' confidence in their ability to communicate sexual consent with a partner (4-point likert, "not at all confident" to "very confident", higher scores = higher self-efficacy)

Behavioral outcome measuring whether a condom was used for sexual intercourse

Behavioral outcome measuring discussion about condom use prior to sexual intercourse

Behavioral outcome measuring affirmative consent communication before and during sexual intercourse

Participants' beliefs about the importance of condom use (items from the Condom Attitudes scale, strongly disagree to strongly agree, higher scores = more positive attitudes)

Participants' beliefs about the importance of affirmative consent (items from the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised, strongly disagree to strongly agree, higher scores = more positive attitudes)

Participants' personal and perceived norms about condom use (condom norms items from the Psychosocial Scales, higher score = more positive norms)

Participants' personal and perceived norms about affirmative consent (Norms items from Sexual Consent Scale-Revised, strongly disagree to strongly agree, higher scores = more positive norms)

Participants' perceptions of the likability and usefulness of the program (items adapted from Acceptability of Intervention measure, "not at all" to "a lot", higher scores = higher acceptability)

How much of the intervention did participants complete?

How much does it cost to implement the intervention?