Polyene phosphatidylcholine injection
DrugFormulated as an injectable solution containing Polyene Phosphatidylcholine at two concentration of 25 mg/mL and 50 mg/mL.
Other names: AYP-101
NCT Number: NCT03982225
Phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of three concentration of polyene phosphatidylcholine injection (AYP-101) compared to placebo for the reduction of submental fat.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
This study is to determine the optimal dose and evaluate safety and efficacy of Polyene Phosphatidylcholine S.C injection (AYP-101) for the reduction of Submental Fat (SMF) who wish improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe convexity or fullness associated with SMF in adults.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Formulated as an injectable solution containing Polyene Phosphatidylcholine at two concentration of 25 mg/mL and 50 mg/mL.
Other names: AYP-101
Phosphate buffered saline placebo for injection
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
A composite 1-grade response is defined as at least a 1-grade improvement from Baseline on both the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) is evaluated by independent assessor and Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS) using the following scale:
0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
The CR-SMFRS is defined as at least a 1-grade improvement is evaluated by independent assessor from Baseline using the following scale:
0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
The PR-SMFRS is based on the participant's response to the question "How much fat do you have under your chin right now?" answered on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4):
0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
Change rate of reduction in pre-platysmal volume.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
Change rate of reduction in platysmal volume.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
A composite 2-grade response is defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline on both the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS) is evaluated by independent assessor and Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (PR-SMFRS) using the following scale:
0 = no chin fat at all, 1 = a slight amount of chin fat, 2 = a moderate amount of chin fat, 3 = a large amount of chin fat, and 4 = a very large amount of chin fat.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
A SSRS response is defined as an SSRS score that is 4 or greater 12 weeks after the last treatment.
The SSRS assesses participant's satisfaction with their appearance in association with the face and chin on a 7-point scale from 0 to 6: where 0 = Extremely dissatisfied, 1 = Dissatisfied, 2 = Slightly dissatisfied, 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = Slightly satisfied, 5 = Satisfied and 6 = Extremely satisfied.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
Patients are asked to rate the visual and emotional impact that the appearance of submental fullness had on their self-perception using 11-point scale range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact).
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
The cervical mental angle is measured using a 3D scanner photograph obtained at first and last visit.
Time frame: 12 weeks after last treatment
Patient global impression of change scale (PGIC) is to rate patients total improvement or worsening in the appearance since before the first treatment compared to final treatment with 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
Difference of Derriford Appearance Scale 24 (DAS24) is to measure distress and dysfunction to problems of appearance with 24 questions using 4-point from 0 (None) to 4 (more distress).
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after last treatment
Body Image Quality Life Inventory (BIQLI) assesses participants' body image using 7-point ranging from -3 (very negative) to +3 (very positive).
AMIpharm Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Multicenter, Randomized, Subject-assessor Blind, Placebo Controlled Phase Ⅱ Study to Determine the Optimal Dose of AYP-101 S.C. Injection for the Reduction of Submental Fat
Acronym: AYP-101
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05266729
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT01426373
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02007434
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Tempe, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00618722
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Carina Heights, Australia
View Trial Details