University of Rochester, Eastman Institute for Oral Health
Rochester, New York, 14620, United States
NCT Number: NCT02018822
This double blind randomized controlled prospective clinical trial will compare the clinical success of two tooth colored resin composite dental filling materials - TPH3 (Dentsply Caulk) and an experimental urethane dimethacrylate resin based composite resin (Dentsply Caulk) for wear resistance, staining and marginal seal using modified Ryge criteria to evaluate the posterior restorations for 24 months in duration
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rochester, New York, 14620, United States
The purposes of this clinical trial is to evaluate two composite resins used to restore Class I and Class II cavities in teeth of adults. The clinical study will evaluate the resin composite restorations placed in Class I and Class II cavity preparations for anatomic form, color match, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, proximal contact, polishability, caries, sensitivity, gingival index, staining,wear, and thermal response for 24 months..
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
• must have given written consent to participate in the trial
Exclusion criteria
Experimental urethane dimethacrylate resin based composite resin for teeth used with prime and Bond Elect bonding agent
light-cured resin composite for teeth
light cured resin composite for teeth made by Dentsply Caulk
Time frame: 24 months
Anatomic form was graded as:
A=The restoration is continuous with existing form. B=The restoration is discontinuous with existing anatomic form, but the existing material is not sufficient to expose dentine.
Time frame: 24 months
A=The restoration appears to match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth structure.
B=The restoration does not match the shade and translucency of adjacent tooth structure, but the mismatch is within the normal range of tooth shades and translucency.
Time frame: 24 months
A= No visible evidence of a crevice along the margin into which the explorer will penetrate B1= Explorer clicks on the margin B2= Visible evidence of a crevice
Time frame: 24 months
A= There is no visual evidence of marginal discoloration different from the color of the restorative material and from the color the adjacent tooth structure.
B= There is visual evidence of marginal discoloration at the junction of the tooth structure and the restoration, but the discoloration has not penetrated along the restoration in a pulpal direction.
Time frame: 24 months
A= Tight proximal contacts evaluated with dental floss. B= Proximal contacts are weak but present. C= No proximal contacts but not visibly open. NA= Class I restorations
Time frame: 24 months
A= Smooth & highly shiny, similar to enamel B1= Smooth & satin, highly reflective B2= Smooth & shiny but not highly reflective
University of Rochester
Other
Clinical Evaluation of an Experimental Urethane Dimethacrylate Resin Based Composite
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07718412
Behavior, Dental Caries
Sivas, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720999
Dental Caries, Neurologic Manifestations
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04750902
Dental Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06861725
Caries Arrested, Dental Caries
Cairo, Cairo Guv, Egypt
View Trial Details