OmniHeart 4.0 Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device
DeviceThe experimental group was treated with OmniHeart 4.0 Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device
NCT Number: NCT07622446
The objective of this clinical trial is to understand the effectiveness and safety of the OmniHeart 4.0 percutaneous ventricular assist device produced by ShanghaiDynaheart Medical Technology Co., Ltd. in providing hemodynamic support for high-risk PCI patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:
During the treatment of high-risk PCI, will the application of the OmniHeart 4.0 percutaneous ventricular assist device achieve hemodynamic support that is not inferior to that of ECMO? What medical problems will occur during or after the treatment for participants who receive the OmniHeart 4.0 percutaneous ventricular assist device during high-risk PCI treatment? The researchers will compare the OmniHeart 4.0 percutaneous ventricular assist device with ECMO (a mechanical circulatory support device) using ECMO as the control group to compare the efficacy differences between the two and thereby evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the OmniHeart 4.0 percutaneous ventricular assist device in high-risk PCI treatment.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio according to need during high-risk PCI treatment to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will receive the OmniHeart 4.0 percutaneous ventricular assist device for assistance, while the control group will receive the veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) device for assistance.
Check-ups and follow-ups will be conducted during the device usage period, at the time of weaning from the device, before discharge, 30 days after surgery, and 90 days after surgery.
The effectiveness endpoint will be evaluated by recording indicators such as the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) free of death within 30 days after surgery.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Jilin City, China
This clinical trial adopts a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority design, with a planned enrollment of 254 subjects. It comprehensively evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the investigational device in human subjects, so as to provide sufficient evidence for the marketing approval and registration of the product in China. The rationale for the trial design is specified as follows:
Prospective design: A prospective study can establish clear causal relationships, with unified diagnostic, testing and evaluation criteria for collected data, thus enabling controllable data processing.
Multicenter design: A multicenter trial can accrue a larger number of cases within the same time frame, thereby shortening the duration of the clinical trial; since a multicenter trial is conducted by multiple clinical investigators across different regions and trial sites, its conclusions generally have broad representativeness.
Randomized controlled trial:
Comparison: In the routine clinical treatment, ECMO is of certain representativeness. Therefore, this product was selected as the control device for this clinical trial. Using the ECMO product as the control, the efficacy differences between the experimental group and the control group were compared to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the experimental product.
Non-inferiority: To evaluate the experimental device when used in high-risk PCI treatment, the rate of avoiding major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) within 30 days after surgery was non-inferior to that of the control device.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Among them, a three-vessel coronary artery lesion is defined as follows: there is at least one significant stenosis in each of the three main epicardial coronary arteries (the left anterior descending branch and/or its branches, the left circumflex branch and/or its branches, the right coronary artery and/or its branches). A significant stenosis is defined as a luminal stenosis >= 50% (by visual inspection) or complete occlusion, and at least two vessels have a luminal stenosis >= 70%. For left-dominant coronary arteries, the presence of >= 50% stenosis in both the left anterior descending branch and the proximal left circumflex branch is also regarded as a three-vessel coronary artery lesion.
Exclusion criteria
The experimental group was treated with OmniHeart 4.0 Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device
The control group received ECMO treatment.
Time frame: 30 days after procedure
MACCE includes: all-cause mortality, stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction, and repeat coronary revascularization.
Time frame: 90 days after procedure
MACCE includes: all-cause mortality, stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction, and repeat coronary revascularization.
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
MAE includes: all-cause mortality, stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat coronary revascularization, cardiac or vascular surgery required, acute kidney injury, cardiopulmonary resuscitation/ventricular arrhythmias requiring cardioversion therapy, moderate/severe aortic valve insufficiency, severe hypotension requiring pressor therapy, and failed angioplasty.
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: Intraprocedure - weaning off
The performance of the device during use is comprehensively evaluated by researchers. The comprehensive evaluation mainly includes: performance of the control unit and performance of the percutaneous implantable catheter pump and infusion components.
Control unit performance evaluation: clarity of interface, operational stability, timeliness of alarms, and ease of operation (for professional personnel only).
Percutaneous implantable catheter pump and infusion component performance evaluation: pushability of the catheter pump, vulnerability of the catheter pump, stability of pump rate and blood volume delivered (under favorable conditions and stable vital signs), ease of removal of the catheter pump, and usability of the catheter pump and infusion components (for professional personnel only).
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Time frame: 30 days and 90 days after procedure
Shanghai Dynaheart Medtech Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the OmniHeart 4.0 Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device for Hemodynamic Support in Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07010965
High-risk PCI
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06274411
ECMO, High-risk PCI
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07380217
Coronary Artery Disease Risk High, High-risk PCI
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06754839
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial Details