olorofim
Drug30mg oral tablets
Other names: F901318
NCT Number: NCT03583164
A study to evaluate olorofim (F901318) for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in participants lacking suitable alternative treatment options.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
An open label, single arm Phase IIb study of olorofim (F901318) in participants with invasive fungal infections with limited treatment options. Participants received study treatment for up to 12 weeks in the main phase of the study. At the Investigator's request and after discussion with the medical monitor, open-label treatment with F901318 could be continued in patients judged by the Investigator to need therapy beyond 84 days and considered likely to continue to benefit from extended treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
30mg oral tablets
Other names: F901318
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The primary efficacy variable was the DRC-adjudicated overall response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria. For the primary statistical analysis of overall response rate, values were assigned to the DRC adjudicated overall response as follows: Success (Success-Complete, Success-Partial); Failure (Failure-Stable, Failure-Progression, Death, and participants for whom data at the Day 42 Study Visit could not be collected or participants who were considered not evaluable at the Day 42 Study Visit).
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The primary efficacy variable was the DRC-adjudicated overall response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. This was also presented by each of the 5 major infections as adjudicated by the DRC at baseline. The Aspergillus- All category is a combination of participants with Aspergillus proven and Aspergillus probable (invasive aspergillosis lower respiratory tract disease) baseline disease category. Overall success is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The primary efficacy variable was the DRC-adjudicated overall response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent Data Review Committee using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. This was also presented by each of the 5 major infections as adjudicated by the DRC at baseline, this one is for participants with a proven infection due to Lomentospora prolificans. Success is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The primary efficacy variable was the DRC-adjudicated overall response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. This was also presented by each of the 5 major infections as adjudicated by the DRC at baseline, this one is for participants with a proven infection due to Scedosporium species. Success is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The primary efficacy variable was the DRC-adjudicated overall response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. This was also presented by each of the 5 major infections as adjudicated by the DRC at baseline, this one is for participants with proven infection due to Coccidioides species. Success is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The primary efficacy variable was the DRC-adjudicated overall response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. This was also presented by each of the 5 major infections as adjudicated by the DRC at baseline, this one is for participants with proven infection due to other olorofim susceptible fungi. Success is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
DRC-adjudicated overall response at Day 84, as determined by an independent DRC using a combination of clinical, mycological, and radiological results based on the EORTC/MSG criteria. For the analysis of overall response rate, values were assigned to the DRC-adjudicated overall response as follows: Success (Success-Complete, Success-Partial); Failure (Failure-Stable, Failure-Progression, Death, and participants for whom data at the Study Visit could not be collected or participants who were considered not evaluable at the Study Visit).
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
Investigator-assessed overall response (as determined by the Investigator using all available assessment results including clinical, mycological and radiologic results based on the EORTC/MSG criteria) at Day 42, categorised by the same response criteria as in the primary endpoint: Success (Success-Complete, Success-Partial), Failure (Failure-Stable, Failure-Progression, Death, participants for whom data at Day 42 could not be collected or who were considered not evaluable at the specific visit).
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
Investigator-assessed overall response (as determined by the Investigator using all available assessment results including clinical, mycological and radiologic results based on the EORTC/MSG criteria) at Day 84, categorised by the same response criteria as in the primary endpoint: Success (Success-Complete, Success-Partial), Failure (Failure-Stable, Failure-Progression, Death, participants for whom data at Day 84 could not be collected or who were considered not evaluable at the specific visit).
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main phase of study treatment
DRC adjudicated clinical response at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent Data Review Committee using clinical response results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. Resolution is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main phase of study treatment
DRC adjudicated clinical response at the Day 84 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using clinical response results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. Resolution is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main phase of study treatment
Investigator assessed clinical response at the Day 42 Study Visit using clinical response results based on the EORTC/MSG criteria. Resolution is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
Investigator assessed clinical response at the Day 84 Study Visit using clinical response results based on the EORTC/MSG criteria. Resolution is defined as a Complete or Partial Response.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
DRC adjudicated mycological response was assessed at the Day 42 Study Visit, as determined by an independent Data Review Committee using mycological response results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. Success is defined as eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main phase of study treatment
DRC adjudicated mycological response was assessed at the Day 84 Study Visit, as determined by an independent DRC using mycological response results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. Success is defined as eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
Mycological response was assessed by the Investigator at the Day 42 Study Visit using mycological response results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. Success is defined as eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
Mycological response was assessed by the Investigator at the Day 84 Study Visit using mycological response results based on EORTC/MSG criteria. Success is defined as eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main phase of study treatment
In participants for whom radiology formed a part of their diagnosis, radiology evaluations were required on Day 42 and were adjudicated by an independent DRC. Radiological responses were assigned as per EORTC/MSG criteria.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
In participants for whom radiology formed a part of their diagnosis, radiology evaluations were required on Day 84 and were adjudicated by an independent DRC. Radiological responses were assigned as per EORTC/MSG criteria.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
In participants for whom radiology formed a part of their diagnosis, radiology evaluations were required on Day 42. Radiological responses were assessed by the Investigator using EORTC/MSG criteria.
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
In participants for whom radiology formed a part of their diagnosis, radiology evaluations were required on Day 84. Radiological responses were assessed by the Investigator using EORTC/MSG criteria.
Time frame: Day 42 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The all cause mortality rate at Day 42 uses the survival status that was entered at the study visit (which employs a window around each nominal study day).
Time frame: Day 84 in the Main Phase of study treatment
The all cause mortality rate at Day 84 uses the survival status that was entered at the study visit (which employs a window around each nominal study day).
F2G Biotech GmbH
Industry
Phase IIb Study of F901318 as Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections Due to Lomentospora Prolificans, Scedosporium Spp., Aspergillus Spp., and Other Resistant Fungi in Patients Lacking Suitable Alternative Treatment Options
Acronym: FORMULA-OLS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03572049
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Blastomycosis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07716878
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06983665
Agranulocytosis, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06977490
Agranulocytosis, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial Details