Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical college Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100005, China
NCT Number: NCT03691818
This study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial in a Chinese population.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100005, China
This study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial in a Chinese population. Active drug and placebo were used as controls to observe the relative efficacy of X0002 spray.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
According to the different dose groups assigned, each knee joint was sprayed with 1, 2 or 4 sprays.
Other names: Test drug
Ibuprofen Tab 400mg, tid.
Other names: Active drug
Ibuprofen Placebo Tab 400mg, tid.
Other names: Placebo Oral Tablet
According to the different dose groups assigned, each knee joint was sprayed with 1, 2 or 4 sprays.
Other names: Placebo Spray
Time frame: week 12
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) has been used to assess subjects with OA of the hip or knee and consists of 24 questions in subscales measuring 3 concepts: pain, stiffness, and physical function. These questions measure the amount of pain, degree of difficulty in completing various day-to-day activities, and stiffness experienced in the hip or knee. Usually subject self-administered. A single question has 100 grades, where 0 = very good and 100 = very much worse. VAS (visual analog scale) scale is used for score record.
Data for the exploratory efficacy endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics.
Time frame: week 1 to week 14
A sensitivity analysis will also be conducted on the Primary Efficacy Endpoint using an ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed class effect and WOMAC baseline pain subscale score as covariates, but the comparisons of interest will be the difference between the active and placebo subjects within each treatment group.
The Secondary Efficacy Endpoints, change from Baseline in the WOMAC subscale scores for pain, stiffness, and functional ability, and overall WOMAC score, will be by analyzed using the same methods as the for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 2,4,8
The WOMAC pain subscale has 5 questions. Usually subject self-administered. A single question has 100 grades, where 0 = no pain and 100 = pain as bad as can be.
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is change from Baseline in the WOMAC (VAS) pain subscale score for the target knee at week 2, 4, 8, and will be analyzed by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Treatment will be included as a fixed class effect and WOMAC Baseline pain subscale score as covariates.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
The WOMAC stiffness subscale has 2 questions. Usually subject self-administered. A single question has 100 grades, where 0 = no stiffness and 100 = stiffness as bad as can be.
A sensitivity analysis will also be conducted on the Primary Efficacy Endpoint using an ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed class effect and WOMAC baseline stiffness subscale score as covariates, but the comparisons of interest will be the difference between the active and placebo subjects within each treatment group.
The Secondary Efficacy Endpoints, change from Baseline in the WOMAC subscale scores for stiffness at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, will be by analyzed using the same methods as the for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
The WOMAC physical function subscale has 17 questions. Usually subject self-administered. A single question has 100 grades, where 0 = very good and 100 = very much worse.
A sensitivity analysis will also be conducted on the Primary Efficacy Endpoint using an ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed class effect and WOMAC baseline pain subscale score as covariates, but the comparisons of interest will be the difference between the active and placebo subjects within each treatment group.
The Secondary Efficacy Endpoints, change from Baseline in the WOMAC subscale scores for pain, stiffness, and functional ability, and overall WOMAC score at 2, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, will be by analyzed using the same methods as the for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
The WOMAC subscale has 24 questions. Usually subject self-administered. A single question has 100 grades, where 0 = very good and 100 = very much worse. The total score is 2400, the lower, the better; higher score means worse condition.
Data for the exploratory efficacy endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
The subject's overall evaluation of the condition is the relevant questionnaire (0-100mm visual analogue scale), which needs to be completed at the time points listed in the study flow chart. On the scale line of 100mm VAS, mark the left side to indicate "very good" and mark the right side means "Very bad." Data for the exploratory efficacy endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
The subjects' overall evaluation of treatment response is that they fill in the relevant questionnaire VAS (visual analog scale) (VAS, 0~4 points), which should be completed in the time points listed in the study flow chart. 0 = very poor; 4 = very good.
Data for the exploratory efficacy endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
Data for the exploratory efficacy endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: 1 h pre-dose, 1±0.5 h post-dose, 3±0.5 h post-dose, 5±0.5 h post-dose at week 8; 1 h pre-dose, 2±0.5 h post-dose, 4±0.5 h post-dose, 6±0.5 h post-dose at week 12
Cmax of X0002 will be calculated.
Time frame: 1 h pre-dose, 1±0.5 h post-dose, 3±0.5 h post-dose, 5±0.5 h post-dose at week 8; 1 h pre-dose, 2±0.5 h post-dose, 4±0.5 h post-dose, 6±0.5 h post-dose at week 12
AUC of X0002 will be calculated.
Time frame: week 2,4,8, 12
The researchers used the visual analog scale (VAS) for the overall assessment of the disease (VAS scales, 0~4 points), which needed to be completed at the time points listed in the study flow chart. 0 = very poor; 4 = very good.
Data for the exploratory efficacy endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Safety analyses will be conducted on the SAS. Safety parameters will be listed and summarized using standard descriptive statistics, as appropriate. No formal statistical analyses are planned.
Time frame: week 14
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) has been used to assess subjects with OA of the hip or knee and consists of 24 questions in subscales measuring 3 concepts: pain, stiffness, and physical function. These questions measure the amount of pain, degree of difficulty in completing various day-to-day activities, and stiffness experienced in the hip or knee. Usually subject self-administered. A single question has 100 grades, where 0 = very good and 100 = very much worse.
Change in the WOMAC subscale scores for pain, stiffness, and functional ability at week 14 of treatment, will be by analyzed using the same methods as the for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint.
Tianjin XinChen-Techfields Pharma Co., LTD.
Industry
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double-blind and Placebo and Active Control Study to Evaluate the Initial Efficacy and Safety of X0002 Spray in Treatment of Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07327190
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04492670
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT04653896
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07717957
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
View Trial Details