Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00988039

Europe-Africa Research Network for Evaluation of Second-line Therapy

The trial aim is to ascertain what, if anything, needs to be combined with a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) backbone in second-line therapy in order to maximize the chance of a good clinical outcome following WHO-defined failure on a first-line nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and NNRTI-containing regimen with probable extensive NRTI and NNRTI resistance mutations.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

AMPATH Centre at Moi Teaching Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The standard of care for second-line HIV therapy in patients who have failed a first-line NNRTI-based regimen is to combine a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) with two (new) NRTIs. However, patients failing first-line therapy in roll-out programmes often have extensive NRTI resistance mutations that may compromise the efficacy of the NRTI drugs used in second-line therapy and it is likely that the virological potency of the second-line regimen is mostly due to the bPI. It is possible that the contribution of the NRTI drugs to efficacy may be outweighed by additional toxicity and cost. It is also possible that replacing the NRTI drugs with a new class of drug (integrase inhibitors) will improve outcome from second-line therapy, although if the boosted protease inhibitor alone is providing close to optimal response, incremental gains from adding a new class may be small.

The principal aims are to determine whether, in patients failing a first-line NRTI and NNRTI-containing regimen:

  • The use of bPI plus raltegravir (an integrase inhibitor) is superior to standard of care (bPI plus 2 new NRTIs) in achieving good HIV disease control at 96 weeks after randomisation
  • The use of bPI monotherapy, preceded by a 12-week induction period in combination with raltegravir, is non-inferior to standard of care in achieving good HIV disease control at 96 weeks after randomisation

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Previously documented HIV infection on at least one standard antibody-based test
  • Age 12 years and above
  • Taking 2NRTI + NNRTI-based regimen continuously for at least 12 months
  • Naive to protease inhibitor therapy
  • Good adherence to ART in the 12 weeks prior to screening defined as missing medication on no more than 3 days in the prior month
  • Clinically stable and receiving treatment for any known opportunistic infections
  • HIV treatment failure defined by one or more of clinical, immunological or virological criteria defined in the protocol, including VL and CD4 at screening visit
  • Willing and able to give informed consent
  • Able to attend for regular study follow up visits

Exclusion criteria

  • Any major clinical contra-indications to the use of bPI, the NRTIs that are available to be selected for a second-line regimen or raltegravir
  • Known Hepatitis B carrier (Hepatitis B surface antigen positive if tested)
  • Requires concomitant medication with known major interactions with study drugs for which drug substitutions or dose alterations are not available or acceptable
  • Women who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Current participation in another clinical trial involving a treatment intervention (may be permitted in some circumstances, but must be discussed with MRC CTU)
  • Life expectancy of less than one month in the opinion of the treating physician

Treatment and study plan

Aluvia + 2NRTIs

Drug

Aluvia (lopinavir/ritonavir 400mg/100mg), twice daily

The choice of NRTIs will be at the discretion of the managing clinician and based on the local standard of care and drug availability, taking into account patient's previous drug exposure and side effects on first-line therapy.

Aluvia + raltegravir

Drug

Aluvia (lopinavir/ritonavir 400mg/100mg) twice daily

raltegravir (400mg) twice daily

Aluvia monotherapy

Drug

Aluvia (lopinavir/ritonavir 400mg/100mg) twice daily

raltegravir (400mg) twice daily for the first 12 weeks only

Primary outcomes

  1. Good HIV disease control defined as a composite endpoint consisting of all of: - No new WHO stage 4 events - CD4 count >250 cells/mm3 - viral load <10,000 copies/ml or >10,000 copies/ml with no PI resistance mutations

    Time frame: week 96

Secondary outcomes

  1. Good HIV disease control

    Time frame: week 144

  2. Proportion with CD4 cell count >250 cells/mm3

    Time frame: week 96 and week 144

  3. Proportion with new or recurrent WHO stage 4 event

    Time frame: week 96 and week 144

  4. Proportion of patients with plasma viral load <50 copies

    Time frame: week 48, week 96 and week 144

  5. Adverse events

    Time frame: During trial

  6. Quality of life change from randomisation

    Time frame: During trial

  7. Neurocognitive function change from randomisation

    Time frame: during trial

  8. Healthcare costs

    Time frame: During trial

  9. Proportion with serious non-AIDS events

    Time frame: Week 96 and week 144

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Justine Boles

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP)

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate Options for Second-line Therapy in Patients Failing a First-line 2NRTI + NNRTI Regimen in Africa

Acronym: EARNEST

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Oct 1, 2009
Registry last updated
Apr 4, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.