Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04607837

Etrasimod Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for moderately active ulcerative colitis in adult participants.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Queensland Respiratory Services ,Pulse Oceanside Medical{PFT Facility ), Birtinya, Queensland, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) ≥ 3 months prior to screening
  • Active UC confirmed by endoscopy
  • Moderately active UC defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 to 6 and an endoscopic score ≥ 2 and rectal bleeding score ≥ 1
  • Received a surveillance colonoscopy within 12 months before baseline

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe extensive colitis
  • Diagnosis of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis or the presence or history of a fistula consistent with Crohn's disease
  • Diagnosis of microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, or infectious colitis
  • Hospitalization for exacerbation of UC requiring intravenous steroids within 12 weeks prior to or after screening

Treatment and study plan

Etrasimod

Drug

Etrasimod 2 mg tablet by mouth, once daily up to 52 weeks of treatment

Other names: APD334

Placebo

Drug

Etrasimod matching placebo tablet by mouth, once daily up to 52 weeks of treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (CR) at Week 52 Using Modified Mayo Score (MMS)

    Time frame: Week 52

    MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: endoscopic score(ES),rectal bleeding(RB),stool frequency(SF).Each component score ranges from 0 to 3(0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease.ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy,scores ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3(severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]).RB reported most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in 24-hour period,scores ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3(blood alone passes).SF reported number of stools in 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in same period,scores ranged from 0(normal number of stools) to 3(5 or more stools than normal).CR per FDA draft guidance defined as:SF=0 or 1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0,ES less than or equal to (<=)1(excluding friability).Percentage of participants achieving CR at Week 52 was evaluated.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12 Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 12

    MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]). RB reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance was defined as: SF=0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES <=1 (excluding friability). Percentage of participants achieving CR at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    Endoscopic improvement was defined as ES <=1 (excluding friability). ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    Symptomatic remission was defined as SF =0 (or = 1 with a >= 1 point decrease from baseline) and RB =0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving symptomatic remission at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    Complete symptomatic remission was defined as participants with RB = 0 and SF = 0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving complete symptomatic remission at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as ES <=1 (excluding friability) with Geboes score <2.0. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]), higher scores = more severity. The Geboes score grading system was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving mucosal improvement at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Both Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined] Using MMS

    Time frame: Weeks 12 and 52 [Combined]

    MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); higher scores = more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). Clinical remission per FDA draft guidance: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB =0, and ES <=1 (excluding friability). Percentage of participants who achieved clinical remission at both the time points Week 12 and Week 52 [Combined] are reported.

  7. Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 52

    MMS has following components:ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3(0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES:worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease)to 3(severe disease). RB:most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen)to 3(blood alone passes). SF:number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools)to 3(5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES <=1(excluding friability). 12-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for >=12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52. The baseline was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

  8. Percentage of Participants With 12-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 52

    MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES: worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF: number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES <=1(excluding friability). 12-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for >=12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52.

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Among Participants Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 52

    MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF; each ranged as 0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe; total MMS score 0-9; higher scores=more severe disease. ES:worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease)to 3(severe disease). RB:most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3(blood alone passes). SF:number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0(normal number of stools)to 3(5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES <=1(excluding friability). 4-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for >=4 weeks immediately prior to Week 52. The baseline was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

  10. Percentage of Participants With 4-Week Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 52 Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 52

    MMS has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0=normal,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES: worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0(normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease). RB: most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, score ranged from 0(no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). SF: number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). CR per FDA draft guidance as: SF =0 or =1 and no greater than baseline, RB=0, and ES <=1(excluding friability). 4-week corticosteroid-free CR was defined as CR at Week 52 and corticosteroid-free for >=4 weeks immediately prior to Week 52.

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12 Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 12

    Clinical response was defined as a >=2-point and >=30 percentage (%) decrease from baseline in MMS, and a >=1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore <=1 and is as per FDA draft guidance. MMS was used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, score ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]). Percentage of participants achieving clinical response at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 52 Using MMS

    Time frame: Week 52

    Clinical response was defined as a >=2-point and >=30 % decrease from baseline in MMS, and a >=1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore <=1 and is as per FDA draft guidance. MMS is used to assess disease activity in participants with UC and has following components: ES, RB and SF. Each component scores ranges from 0 to 3 (0= normal, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe); where total score is sum of three components giving total MMS score as 0 to 9; higher scores indicating more severe disease. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]). Percentage of participants achieving clinical response at Week 52 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  13. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Endoscopic improvement was defined as ES <=1 (excluding friability). ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic improvement at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as ES <=1 (excluding friability) with Geboes score <2.0. ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]), higher scores = more severity. The Geboes score grading system was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving mucosal improvement at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Symptomatic remission was defined as SF =0 (or = 1 with a >= 1 point decrease from baseline) and RB =0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving symptomatic remission at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Complete symptomatic remission was defined as participants with RB = 0 and SF = 0. SF subscore: reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, scores ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. RB subscore: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving complete symptomatic remission at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in Both ES and RB or in Both ES and SF at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    ES reported worst appearance of mucosa on flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy, scores ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease [spontaneous bleeding, ulceration]), higher scores = more severity. RB: reported the most severe amount of blood passed per rectum in a 24-hour period, scores ranged from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes), higher scores = more severity. SF reported number of stools in a 24-hour period relative to normal number of stools for that participant in the same period, score ranged from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal), higher scores = more severity. Percentage of participants with reduction from baseline in both ES and RB or in both ES and SF at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint. The baseline primary analysis set was balanced between treatment groups and representative of participants with mildly to moderately active UC.

  18. Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on the Geboes Grading System at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Histologic response based on the Geboes grading system was defined as Geboes score <=3.1. The Geboes score grading system is a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving histologic response based on the Geboes grading system at week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

  19. Percentage of Participants Achieving Histologic Response Based on Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    RHI is an evaluative index, derived from the Geboes score, that is designed to be reproducible and responsive to clinically meaningful change in disease activity over time. Histologic response based on RHI was defined as decrease in RHI of >=7 points from baseline. Total RHI score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 33 (severe disease activity), higher score = more severity. Percentage of participants achieving histologic response based on RHI at Week 12 was evaluated in this endpoint.

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 4 weeks post last dose of study treatment (up to 56 Weeks)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

  2. Number of Participants With AEs Based on Severity

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to 4 weeks post last dose of study treatment (up to 56 Weeks)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Severity was classified using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death related to AE. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data for any reporting group were reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Collaborators

  • Arena is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, 52 Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

Acronym: GLADIATOR UC

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 29, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.