Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03996369

Etrasimod Versus Placebo as Induction Therapy in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of etrasimod on clinical remission in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Clinica Adventista Belgrano, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) ≥ 3 months prior to screening
  • Active UC confirmed by endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe extensive colitis
  • Diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis or the presence or history of a fistula consistent with CD
  • Diagnosis of microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, or infectious colitis

Treatment and study plan

Etrasimod

Drug

Etrasimod 2 mg tablet by mouth, once daily up to 12-Week Induction Treatment Period

Other names: APD334

Placebo

Drug

Etrasimod matching placebo tablet by mouth, once daily up to 12-Week Induction Treatment Period

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission

    Time frame: Week 12

    Clinical remission was based on the modified Mayo score (MMS). The MMS is a composite score of 3 assessments consisting of participant-reported symptoms using daily electronic (e)-diary and centrally read endoscopy: stool frequency (SF), rectal bleeding (RB) and endoscopic score (ES). Clinical remission was defined as SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a greater than or equal to [>=] 1-point decrease from Baseline), RB sub-score = 0, and ES less than or equal to (<=) 1 (excluding friability). Each component sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement

    Time frame: Week 12

    Endoscopic improvement was defined as an ES <= 1 (excluding friability). The ES ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal/inactive disease and 3 = severe disease); higher score indicated more severe disease.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission

    Time frame: Week 12

    Symptomatic remission was defined as an SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a >= 1 point decrease from Baseline) and RB sub-score = 0. The SF sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal) and RB sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = no blood and 3 = blood alone passes). Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing

    Time frame: Week 12

    Mucosal healing was defined as an ES <= 1 (excluding friability) with histologic remission measured by a Geboes Index score less than [<] 2.0). The ES ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal/inactive disease and 3 = severe disease). The Geboes score grading system, was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicated more severe disease.

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response

    Time frame: Week 12

    Clinical response was based on the MMS which is a composite score of 3 assessments: SF, RB and ES. Clinical response was defined as a >= 2-point and >= 30 percent (%) decrease from Baseline MMS, and a >= 1-point decrease from Baseline in RB sub-score or an absolute RB sub-score <= 1. Each component sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 and total score range of the MMS was from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Normalization

    Time frame: Week 12

    Endoscopic normalization was defined as an ES = 0. The ES ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0= normal/inactive disease and 3= severe disease); higher score indicated more severe disease.

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Weeks 2, 4 and 8

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 8

    Symptomatic remission was defined as an SF sub-score = 0 (or = 1 with a >= 1 point decrease from Baseline) and RB sub-score = 0. The SF sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal) and RB sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = no blood and 3 = blood alone passes). Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Symptomatic Remission

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    Complete symptomatic remission was defined as an SF sub-score = 0 and RB sub-score = 0. The SF sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal) and RB sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = no blood and 3 = blood alone passes). Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving Non-invasive Clinical Response

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    Non-invasive clinical response was defined as a >= 30% decrease from Baseline in composite RB and SF sub-scores, and a >= 1 point decrease from Baseline in RB sub-score or RB sub-score <= 1. The SF subscore ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal) and RB sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0 = no blood and 3 = blood alone passes). The composite RB and SF score range was from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Response

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    Symptomatic response was defined as a >= 30% decrease from Baseline in composite RB and SF score. The SF sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0= normal number of stools and 3= at least 5 stools more than normal) and RB sub-score ranged from 0 to 3 (where 0= no blood and 3= blood alone passes). The composite RB and SF score range was from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Arena Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Acronym: ELEVATE UC 12

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jun 24, 2019
Registry last updated
Dec 21, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.