Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04441476

Ethical and Psychological Support for Health Care Professions in Intensive Care Units in the COVID19 Pandemic Context: Adequacy With Needs and Psychological Impact Crisis and Post-crisis

The intensive care unit occupies a particular place in our health care system. The urgency of the clinical situations, the proportion of deaths encountered, and the daily workload is likely to generate suffering among staff. The health crisis linked to SARS-COV-2 is unprecedented and has leads to the unprecedented mobilisation of care providers, particularly in the ICU. Faced with the massive and growing influx of patients, human, therapeutic and material resources are overwhelmed and the teams are faced with an unusually heavy workload in a context of extreme tension. These professionals are thus exposed to a risk of over-investment, in a context of acute and repetitive stress, over an indeterminate period of time combining workload, emotional intensity with specific ethical issues, simultaneously affecting the professional sphere but also the personal and family sphere (confinement, risk of contamination). Now more than ever, the mental health of caregivers is an important concern, as highlighted by the CCNE. Mental health is understood in the way in which the individual responds specifically to work-related suffering by developing individual and collective defensive strategies. Thus, the issue of mental health in the ICU cannot be considered without taking into account the strategies that professionals put in place to combat stress and to contribute or not to the construction and stabilization of the work collective (collaboration, support). Ethical and/or psychological support systems have been set up in most of the establishments involved in the care of Covid-19 patients. However, the adequacy of these systems relative to the needs of professionals during and after the crisis is not yet known. We hypothesize that the psychological and social repercussions of this pandemic as well as the individual and collective strategies deployed by ICU care providers to deal with it will evolve in view of the progression of the crisis but also of the various types of support, particularly psychological and/or ethical, available to them.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, 21000, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The study population is the entire ICU staff of the participating centres, whether they are permanently or transiently assigned to these units and/or the institution, whether they are students or not.

Professionals involved in psychological and ethical support structures may also be interviewed to provide the information necessary to describe and evaluate the organisations and their evolution.

Exclusion criteria

  • NA

Treatment and study plan

questionnaires

Other

An online questionnaire (Limesurvey platform) will be made available at 4 different times (M0, M1, M2 and M6).

  • The first questionnaires (M0 and M1) will include a component for professional characterization. Generic and specific stress factors related to ICU and the current pandemic and collective and individual defensive strategies will also be collected in M0 and M1.
  • At M2 and M6, the traumatic impact of the crisis, burnout, signs of depression and recourse to internal or external support in the department (occupational medicine, support unit) will be collected.

psychological and sociological interviews

Other

conducting semi-directive psychological interviews (40 interviews in M2, 40 interviews in M6).

sociological interviews: 40 (20 in M1-M2 then 20 in M6) in order to understand the consequences of the epidemic on daily life, both intra-family and micro-social.

Primary outcomes

  1. PS-ICU Scale Score

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months after the epidemic peak

    This scale integrates generic stressors as well as factors specific to intensive care and crises.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Other

Registry information

Acronym: PsyCOVID

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 22, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.