etanercept
DrugEtanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week
Other names: Enbrel
NCT Number: NCT02376790
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the role of etanercept alone or in combination with methotrexate on disease activity in adults with psoriatic arthritis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
The study will consist of a 30-day screening period, a 48-week double-blind treatment period and a 30-day safety follow-up period.
At or after week 24, participants with an inadequate response could receive rescue therapy with etanercept plus methotrexate until the end of the treatment period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Etanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week
Other names: Enbrel
Methotrexate capsules taken orally once a week. Dosing was initiated at 10 mg weekly and titrated up to a final dose of 20 mg weekly over a 4-week period.
Placebo to etanercept was administered by subcutaneous injection once a week.
Placebo to methotrexate capsules taken orally once a week.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
Time frame: Week 24
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures:
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
A positive ACR20 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
A positive ACR50 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
A positive ACR70 response is defined if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
The tender joint count is an assessment of the pain and/or tenderness of 68 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total tender joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present tenderness.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
The swollen joint count is an assessment of the swelling of 66 joints using a 0 to 1 point scale (0 = none, 1 = present). The total swollen joint count is calculated by summing the number of joints with present swelling.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
A global assessment of the participant's arthritis assessed by the physician on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 mm = No activity at all and 100 mm = Worst activity imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
A global assessment of the participant's arthritis, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No arthritis activity at all and 100 mm = Worst arthritis activity imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
A global assessment of the severity of the participant's joint pain, assessed by the participant on a 100 mm VAS where 0 mm = No pain at all and 100 mm = Worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a specific measure of inflammatory activity.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) is a measure of low disease activity specific for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) that incorporates measures of joint and entheseal inflammation, skin disease, patient reported outcomes and functional disability to assess disease activity. Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of the following 7 outcome measures:
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
PASDAS is a measure of disease activity derived from the following variables:
The composite score is a weighted index where higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items:
The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the following items:
The SDAI score ranges from 0 to 86 with higher scores representing worse disease.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:
DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring in 8 functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains. Two summary component scores are calculated: mental component summary score (MCS) and physical component summary score (PCS). The MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales and the PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features:
In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study.
mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The modified NAPSI scale is a grading system for nail psoriasis that incorporates the following 7 clinical features:
In participants with fingernails involved with psoriasis, each fingernail was scored at baseline to determine the worst fingernail (ie, the fingernail with the highest mNAPSI score). This fingernail was followed for the remainder of the study.
mNAPSI scores range from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease. Clear mNAPSI is defined as a score = 0.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 [none] to 3 [worst]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The Leeds dactylitis index quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if the contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Tenderness of affected digits is assessed on a scale from 0 [none] to 3 [worst]. The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis.
Clear LDI is defined as a score = 0.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The SPARCC enthesitis index assesses enthesitis at 18 sites for palpitation with a resultant total score of 0 to 16 (for scoring purposes, the inferior patella and tibial tuberosity are considered 1 site because of their anatomical proximity). Tenderness at each site is quantified on a dichotomous basis (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Entheses assessed are medial epicondyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (left and right), greater trochanter (left and right), quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (left and right), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (left and right), plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (left and right). A higher count represents greater enthesitis burden.
Clear SPARCC enthesitis is defined as a score = 0.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis.
Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline * 100
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total body surface area involved with psoriasis.
Percent improvement from baseline = (Baseline Value - Post-baseline Value) / Baseline * 100
Time frame: Week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The static Physician Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) evaluates the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale from 0 to 5:
0 = clear (no evidence of plaque elevation, erythema or scaling)
Amgen
Industry
A Multicenter Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of Etanercept and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Subjects With Psoriatic Arthritis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03104400
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03104374
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05458531
Arthritis, Arthritis, Infectious
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01307423
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details