Flapless immediate implant placement
ProcedureExperimental group: No elevation of flap prior to immediate implant placement
NCT Number: NCT02435706
A randomized controlled trial of 12-month duration to compare gingival margin location, buccal horizontal ridge dimensions, and interproximal crestal bone levels following two surgical approaches for immediate placement of implants in the esthetic zone: one involving flap elevation and another using a flapless protocol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
In the test group, the implant will be placed according to standard protocol at a position engaging the palatal wall without elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap.
In the control group, intrasulcular incisions will be carried out from one tooth distal to one tooth mesial to the extraction site and full thickness flaps will be elevated with periosteal elevator, including the papillae. The implant will be placed according to standard protocol at a position engaging the palatal wall, and the flaps will be sutured using a combination of interrupted and mattress sutures.
In both groups, temporary restorations will be delivered immediately after implant placement provided that the implant shows primary stability and has engaged in the bone with an insertion torque of 25Ncm or more. In case of a lower insertion torque, the protocol will be abandoned, a cover screw will be placed, and a two stage implant protocol will be followed. All patients will be advised to receive a permanent restoration 6 months after surgery, if the implant is deemed to be successful.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Experimental group: No elevation of flap prior to immediate implant placement
Control group: Flap will be elevated prior to immediate implant placement
Both groups receive this intervention
Time frame: Change from Pre-operative Baseline in Gingival Margin Location at 3, 6 and 12 months and change from post-operative baseline at 3 and 6 months
Time frame: Change from Baseline in Buccal Horizontal Ridge Dimensions at 3, 6 and 12 months
Horizontal changes of the buccal ridge was calculated through the use of acrylic stents and digital overlays (3Shape D800, Biomet 3i, Palm Beach Gardens, FLS). The acrylic stents were obtained from the pre-surgical plaster casts and they were repositioned on the plaster casts obtained at 3, 6 and 12 months. Discrepancies between the acrylic stent and the plaster cast were measured with a probe. The digital cast overlays were used to analyze changes from pre-surgical to 3 and from 3 to 6 months). The plaster casts were scanned and changes were analyzed with the use of a software.
Time frame: Change from Baseline in Interproximal Crestal Bone Levels at 6 and 12 months
Columbia University
Other
Esthetic Outcomes of Single Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Restoration Performed With Two Surgical Techniques
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07024186
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03657589
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07736833
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Recession
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05470660
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Recession
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details