University of Michigan School of Dentistry
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
NCT Number: NCT01925339
The purpose of this study is to compare two different timings of restoring dental implants that are placed right after tooth extraction: The test group will have the provisional crown placed at the time of implant placement. The control group will have the tooth removed and the implant placed at the same appointment but restorations placed after 4 months. Both procedures currently are accepted methods for replacing missing teeth but direct comparisons of the two procedures are lacking. The results of this study should aid clinicians in selecting the best timing for restoring implants for their patients. The hypothesis is that immediate restoration might increase aesthetic outcomes, e.g. less mucosal recession.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
A single center, randomized controlled, parallel-arm study is planned to investigate esthetic outcomes after immediate placement and restoration in the esthetic zone. Forty adult patients who have a hopeless maxillary anterior or premolar tooth, with intact adjacent teeth will be enrolled. A signed written informed consent will be obtained after he or she has been given verbal and written information describing the nature and duration of the study. Subjects will not be screened or treated until an informed consent has been obtained. Patient information will be protected according to the privacy regulations of the Federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
The enrolled patients will be randomly placed into one of two treatment groups, immediate implant placement (IIP) and restoration group (IR) or the IIP + delayed restoration group (DR). For all patients, the hopeless tooth will be extracted atraumatically and an implant placed immediately. The decision will be made randomly to either restoring the implant immediately (Test group) with a provisional crown or restoring the implant at 4 months after implant placement (Control group). Outcome analyses will be performed until approximately 1-year after the implant surgery and primarily evaluate clinical and radiographic parameters to determine the esthetic outcomes of immediately restored IIP implants, in comparison to those immediately placed but restored in a delayed approach.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Systemic criteria:
Intraoral criteria:
CBCT criteria:
Intraoperative criteria:
Test (immediate restoration)
Control: delayed restoration
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Mucosal level change from baseline to one year was primarily determined by an imaginary line connecting the gingival margin of the adjacent teeth. This was measured in millimeters.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Mean of mesial and distal marginal bone level changes measured by standard radiographs using customized device. This was measured in millimeters.
University of Michigan
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05220865
Dental Caries in Children, Stomatognathic Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06212232
Facial Swelling, Piezoelectric Technique
Catanzaro, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05792800
Caries,Dental, Dental Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details