University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
NCT Number: NCT04232540
This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of delivery of the investigational "MedViewer" intervention in adult patients living with HIV who have been prescribed antiretroviral (ARV) medications. The Medviewer uses Infra-red (IR) matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) technology for mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to analyze patient hair samples to provide information on ARV adherence in real-time.
The study has two different groups of participants: the patients, and their clinician providers.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
This study is part of a larger research program that is investigating a novel non-invasive approach to rapidly quantify ARV concentrations and provide evidence of drug ingestion. The ultimate goal is to provide clinicians and patients feedback on ARV adherence. Infra-red (IR) matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) technology for mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is used to visualize and quantify ARV concentrations in hair. The IR-MALDESI MSI has been labeled the "MedViewer".
Patient participants will be scheduled for the sampling visit to correspond with their next appointment at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Infectious Disease (ID) clinic. Patient participants will be asked to arrive to their clinic appointment at least two hours prior to the scheduled time to be consented and enrolled. If eligible and enrolled in the study, patient participants will have a small hair sample (5 strands) plucked from a discrete location on the back of their head. Patient participants will also have a small blood sample collected. The results from the MedViewer test will be provided to both the patient and their provider, in order to facilitate a discussion around medication adherence. After receiving the results, all participants will complete a brief questionnaire about their experience with the MedViewer.
As this is a feasibility study, results from the Medviewer test will not be used to make clinical decisions related to care.
Major changes after the start of enrollment:
These changes were implemented on November 5, 2020 in a Letter of Amendment (LOA) to ENLIGHTEN Protocol Version 2. The LOA detailed changes made to the protocol due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patient participants:
Provider participants:
Exclusion criteria
Patient participants:
Provider participants:
Results from the analysis of hair samples performed using the MedViewer
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit
Patient participants received their MedViewer report as planned if: (1) they had results delivered to the research team member within 2 hours of initiation of hair sample processing; and (2) discussed results with a provider participant during their clinic visit. The percent of patient participants that received the MedViewer report as planned is reported.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) before patient participant clinic visit
Contacted patients were deemed eligible for a screening visit using a pre-screening questionnaire and provided documented informed consent to participate in the study. The percent of all contacted eligible patients that agreed to participate in study is reported. Per study protocol, this outcome is not measured in providers.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit
Patient participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with the MedViewer report for promoting a productive discussion of ART adherence with a provider participant. Satisfaction was rated on a rated on a 5-point scale (1="very unsatisfied" to 5="very satisfied"), with higher scores being more favorable. The percent of patient participants reporting 4 or greater (4="somewhat satisfied" or 5="very satisfied") on this scale as was calculated.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit
For each of patient participant, provider participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the MedViewer report in promoting a productive discussion with the patient participant about ART adherence using a 5-point scale (1="not at all useful" to 5="extremely useful"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants with provider participants reporting 4 or greater (4="very useful" or 5="extremely useful") on this scale as was calculated.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit
Reasons for patient participants' non-receipt of MedViewer report were only assessed for the subset of patient participants for whom non-receipt was reported. Reasons for non-receipt were assessed by provider participants for each patient participant after their scheduled visit using a single multiple-choice, multiple-answer question. The percent of patient participants for whom a reason or combination of reasons for non-receipt is reported.
Time frame: Time 1 to Time 2 prior to or on Visit 1 (Day 1)
For each patient participant, the number of hours elapsed from the time of initiation of hair processing in the lab (Time 1) to the time of results delivery to designated research staff member (Time 2) was calculated, and a population mean was determined.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants
The 4-point scale measuring the likelihood of future MedViewer report use ranged from 1="definitely would not" to 4="definitely would", with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of participants that scored 3 or greater on the likelihood of future MedViewer use scale (3="probably would" or "4="definitely would") was calculated.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit
Patient participants were asked to rate their comprehension of the information presented in the MedViewer report using a 4-point scale (1="very difficult to understand" to 4="very easy to understand"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants reporting 3 or greater on this scale (3="somewhat easy to understand" or 4="very easy to understand") was calculated.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit
Provider participants were asked to rate each of patient participant's comprehension of the information presented in the MedViewer report using a 5-point scale (1="understood not at all well" to 5="understood excellently"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of patient participants with provider participants reporting 4 or greater (4="understood very well" or 5="understood excellently") on this scale as was calculated.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants
Participants were asked to rate their perceived usefulness of the MedViewer report for promoting ART adherence. Usefulness was rated on a rated on a 5-point scale (1="not at all useful" to 5="extremely useful"), with higher scores being more favorable. A mean usefulness score was calculated for each participant.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1) after patient participant clinic visit for patient participants, end line visit for provider participants
Participants were asked to rate the comparative satisfaction with patient participant-provider participant discussions during the MedViewer visits as compared to typical visits. Patient participants were asked this question after Visit 1, while provider participants were asked this question at their end line visit. Change in relationship was rated on 5-point scale (1="much less satisfied than usual" to 5="much more satisfied than usual"), with a higher score being more favorable. The percent of participants reporting 4 or greater on this scale (4="somewhat more satisfied than usual" or 5="much more satisfied than usual") was calculated.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
Acronym: ENLIGHTEN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01038076
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Behavior
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02301533
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Mtwapa, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT01058694
AIDS, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Kisumu, Maseno District, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT06216600
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial Details