Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa
Lisbon, 1649-003, Portugal
NCT Number: NCT01236963
It is difficult to obtain patient's compliance with regular interproximal dental hygiene. Dental floss is recognized as an effective procedure to remove dental plaque and prevent gingivitis in the space between teeth, but it is difficult to use and most patients do no do it regularly. Essential oils mouthrinse acts on dental plaque bacteria and helps on gingivitis prevention. These properties may be of interest to control dental plaque accumulation and gingivitis in interproximal areas. The study hypothesis states that there are no differences between the use of an essential oils mouthrinse and dental floss on the reduction of dental plaque accumulation and gingivitis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me15 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lisbon, 1649-003, Portugal
The use of mouthwashes or rinses as an adjunct to mechanical plaque removal should be considered by oral health professionals as part of a strategy to prevent and control patients' oral problems. Most individuals do not brush or floss for the required duration or with the necessary skill to ensure effectiveness, even after receiving hygiene instruction and motivation (Beals et al., 2000; Ciancio, 2003; Santos, 2003). Consequently, inadequate oral hygiene leads to plaque buildup, a key etiological factor in periodontal disease and dental caries. Mouthwashes containing essential oils and rinses with delmopinol have proven effective in controlling plaque development and preventing gingivitis (Baehni and Takeuchi, 2003).
The American Dental Association (ADA) has established guidelines for studying the efficacy of oral hygiene products on gingivitis and plaque accumulation. These guidelines, found in the Acceptance Program Guidelines, provide instructions on planning and evaluating various types of laboratory and clinical studies to test mouthwashes and rinses (ADA, 1997-2008).
In laboratory studies, the effectiveness of antiseptic oral products is tested for their ability to inhibit oral microorganisms. The goal is to determine if these products alter the oral flora. Plaque samples for these studies are collected at baseline and at the end of the experimental period from a predetermined dental surface. Samples are recorded in colony-forming units per millilitre (CFU/ml). For non-specific plaque evaluation, samples are grown on a general nutrient medium, while specific bacteria require selective culture media (ADA, 2008). Bacterial resistance and growth inhibition are assessed using the minimum inhibitory concentration method, typically via the disk diffusion test (ADA, 2008).
Clinical studies, approved by an ethics committee, must demonstrate the efficacy of mouthwashes and rinses in reducing plaque accumulation and gingivitis. Participants undergo a comprehensive oral examination at the study's outset to assess initial conditions, inclusion, and exclusion criteria, and to obtain informed consent (ADA, 1997). Clinical variables are measured at baseline, at study end, and optionally at an intermediate point (ADA, 2006). Sample size must allow for statistical testing with a significance level of 1% or 5% and a power of 80% whenever possible (ADA, 2007). Study duration varies by objective; demonstrating antiseptic properties requires at least six months, while evaluating effects on gingivitis and plaque can be done in as little as two weeks (Collaert et al., 1992-2007).
Participants should be from the product's target population, with usage not necessarily supervised by the researcher. Studies must include both genders and various age groups, with random assignment to experimental and control groups (ADA, 2008). Participants must be healthy adults with no oral pathology and similar oral hygiene conditions, avoiding medications that affect gingival parameters during the study (ADA, 2008). Clinical variables related to plaque and gingivitis are assessed using scientifically recognized indices.
In summary, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mouthwashes and rinses in controlling plaque and gingivitis, following established guidelines to ensure rigorous and systematic assessment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Commercial mouthrinse with manufacturer's use indications
Other names: Listerine Cool Mint
Other names: Colgate Total dental floss
Time frame: change from baseline in gingival index at two weeks
data collected at the begining of the study and two weeks after mouthrinse or dental floss use
Time frame: change from baseline in bleeding index at two weeks
data collected at the begining of the study and two weeks after mouthrinse or dental floss use
Time frame: change from baseline in plaque index at two weeks
data collected at the begining of the study and two weeks after mouthrinse or dental floss use
University of Lisbon
Other
Comparison of Efficacy on Interproximal Gingivitis and Dental Plaque Accumulation of an Essential Oils Mouthrinse and Dental Floss.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01236950
Dental Plaque Accumulation, Gingival Diseases
Lisbon, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07414173
Dental Plaque Accumulation, Gingival Diseases
Schenefeld, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07725276
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Beirut, Rue de Damas, Lebanon
View Trial DetailsNCT07488403
Gingival Diseases, Gingivitis
Antalya, KONYAALTI, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details