Ultrasound Guided ESP Block with Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) for VATS
ProcedureProgrammed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) of Levobupivacaine
NCT Number: NCT05181371
Fascial plane blocks, such as ESP, rely on the spread of local anaesthetic on an interfacial plane, automated boluses may be particularly useful for this group of blocks. However, until recently, ambulatory pumps capable of providing automated boluses in addition to patient-controlled boluses were not widely available. To best of our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus strategies for Erector Spinae Plane Block for MITS in terms of patient centred outcomes such as quality of recovery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS) has been shown to reduce postoperative pain, reduce tissue trauma and contribute to better recovery as compared to open thoracotomy. However, it still causes significant acute post-operative pain. Our Mater research group has shown that fascial plane blocks such as the Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP) contribute to post-operative analgesia after MITS. Case reports have described the improved quality of analgesia following ESP using programmed intermittent boluses (PIB) instead of continuous infusion. It is hypothesised that larger, repeated bolus doses provide superior analgesia, possibly as a result of improved spread of the local anaesthetic. Evidence for improved spread of local anaesthetic may be found in one study which demonstrated that PIB increased the number of affected dermatomal levels compared to continuous infusions for continuous paravertebral blocks. Similarly, with regard to labour epidural analgesia, PIB provides better analgesia compared with continuous infusion.
Because fascial plane blocks, such as ESP, rely on the spread of local anaesthetic on an interfacial plane, automated boluses may be particularly useful for this group of blocks. However, until recently, ambulatory pumps capable of providing automated boluses in addition to patient-controlled boluses were not widely available. To the best of our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus strategies for Erector Spinae Plane Block for MITS in terms of patient-centered outcomes such as quality of recovery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) of Levobupivacaine
Continuous Infusion (CI) of Levobupivacaine
Time frame: 24 hours
Patient centred metric to measure the quality of recovery after surgery. Scale is between 0-150, where '0' refers to poor quality of recovery and '150' refers to excellent quality of recovery
Time frame: 48 hours
This will be measured with a calibrated incentive spirometer at the bedside
Time frame: 48 hours
Pain scores (0-10). '0' refers to no pain and '10' refers to severe pain.
Time frame: 48 hours
Pain scores (0-10). '0' refers to no pain and '10' refers to severe pain.
Time frame: 48 hours
Will be measured from immediate postoperative in minutes
Time frame: 48 hours
Will be measured from immediate postoperative in hours
Time frame: 24 hours
Will be measured from immediate postoperative in minutes
Time frame: 30 days
Will be measured from immediate postoperative in days
Time frame: 48 hours
Patient centred metric to measure the quality of recovery after surgery. Scale is between 0-150, where '0' refers to poor quality of recovery and '150' refers to excellent quality of recovery
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Other
Ultrasound Guided, Continuous Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus (PIB) vs Continuous Infusion on Quality of Recovery and Postoperative Respiratory Function
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04943874
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06344897
Acute Pain, Appendicitis
Konya, Karatay, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04252833
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Pasadena, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05283980
Acute Pain, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details