Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01894815

Escitalopram, Placebo and tDCS in Depression: a Non-inferiority Trial

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, mostly treated with antidepressant drugs, which are limited for issues such as refractoriness and adverse effects. In this context, the investigators investigate a non-pharmacological treatment known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). To prove that tDCS is similarly effective than antidepressants would have a tremendous impact in clinical psychiatry, since tDCS is virtually absent of adverse effects. Its ease of use, portability and low price are also interesting characteristics for using in primary and secondary health care. Thus, our aim is to compare tDCS against a fully dosed, effective antidepressant. The study will be a non-inferiority, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, three-arm trial comparing active tDCS/placebo pill, sham tDCS/escitalopram 20mg/day and sham tDCS/placebo pill. Our primary aim is to show that tDCS is not inferior to escitalopram 20mg/day with a noninferiority margin of at least 50% of the escitalopram-placebo effect.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition, mostly treated with antidepressant drugs, which are limited for issues such as refractoriness and adverse effects. In this context, the researchers investigate a non-pharmacological treatment known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In a prior clinical trial with 120 patients with MDD, the investigators demonstrated that the combination of tDCS with sertraline 50mg/day had increased, faster effects on depressive symptoms (Brunoni et al., JAMA Psychiatry, 2013). However, although the investigators suggested that tDCS vs. sertraline had similar efficacy, such comparison was compromised due to the low sertraline dose and also because the comparison of sertraline vs. placebo was not significant. To prove that tDCS is similarly effective than antidepressants would have a tremendous impact in clinical psychiatry, since tDCS is virtually absent of adverse effects. Its ease of use, portability and low price are also interesting characteristics for using in primary and secondary health care. Thus, our aim is to compare tDCS against a fully dosed, effective antidepressant. The study will be a non-inferiority, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, three-arm trial comparing active tDCS/placebo pill, sham tDCS/escitalopram 20mg/day and sham tDCS/placebo pill for ten weeks, randomizing 240 patients with MDD in a 3:3:2 ratio (less to placebo). Our primary aim is to show that tDCS is not inferior to escitalopram 20mg/day with a noninferiority margin of at least 50% of the escitalopram-placebo effect. As secondary aims, the researchers will investigate putative biomarkers for tDCS response. This is important considering the large sample size of this study and also the paucity of tDCS studies - therefore, the identification of such biomarkers could generate new hypothesis for future studies and for tDCS' mechanisms of action. The biomarkers will be: genetic polymorphisms (BDNF, SLC6A4, THP1, 5HT2A); serum markers (BDNF); motor cortical excitability (cortical silent period, intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation); heart rate variability; and neuroimaging (structural volume of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex, white matter tracts of the prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex connectivity). This project represents a novel research line in our Institution, and the investigators thereby propose the onset of a new center denominated C.I.N.A. (Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation) that will foment the use and development of projects using neuromodulation techniques. This new center will also interact with other centers on the fields of clinical research, neurosciences and neuropsychiatry.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • HAMD17>=17
  • more than 8 years of schooling OR able to read, speak and understand the Portuguese language.
  • Low suicide risk.

Exclusion criteria

  • Bipolar disorders.
  • Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.
  • Anxiety disorders, if it is the primary diagnosis (comorbidity with depression is not an exclusion disorder)
  • Substance abuse or dependence.
  • Depression symptoms better explained by medical conditions.
  • Neurologic conditions (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor).
  • Severe medical conditions.
  • Pregnancy/breast-feeding.
  • Severe suicidal ideation, suicidal planning or recent (<4 weeks) suicide attempt.
  • Contra-indications to escitalopram.
  • Current use of escitalopram in the current depressive episode.
  • Use of escitalopram in a prior depressive episode that was not effective.
  • Contra-indications to tDCS.
  • Previous use of tDCS (current or previous depressive episode).

Treatment and study plan

Escitalopram Oxalate

Drug

The investigators will use 10mg and 20mg pills. The investigators will up-titrate escitalopram from 10 to 20mg/day according to the patient tolerability. The maximum dose (20mg/day) is sought to be achieved at week 3.

Other names: Reconter

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Device

The anode will be applied over the F3 area and the cathode over the F4 area. The current dose is 2mA, current density is 0.8 A/m2. Electrodes will be 5x5cm in size. The investigators will apply 15 daily, consecutive tDCS sessions (excluding weekends) and after that one session per week until the primary endpoint.

Other names: tDCS - Soterix Medical Device for Clinical Trials

Sham tDCS + Placebo Pill

Other

This group receives sham tDCS and placebo pill.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items (HAMD17)

    Time frame: Weeks 0 and 10

    Continuous measure (score changes). Non-inferiority assessment: the difference between tDCS to escitalopram should be >50% of escitalopram to placebo efficacy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in HDRS

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 8, 10

    Continuous measure (score changes).

  2. Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 10

    Continuous measure (score changes).

  3. Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 10

  4. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 10

  5. Change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 10

  6. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items (HAMD17)

    Time frame: Week 10

    Response (≥50% improvement from week 0 to 10)

  7. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17 items (HAMD17)

    Time frame: Week 10

    Remission (HAMD17 ≤7) at week 10.

  8. Adverse events

    Time frame: Week 3 and Week 10.

    Assessment and comparisons of tDCS and drug adverse events. We used a tDCS adverse events questionnaire (Brunoni et al., 2011) and the SAFTEE.

  9. Serious adverse events

    Time frame: Up to Week 10.

    Serious adverse events include treatment-emergent hypomania/mania (YMRS>8), suicide, psychiatric hospitalization and others life-threatening or incapacitant events.

  10. Young Manic Rating Scale (YMRS)

    Time frame: Week 3 and Week 10.

    Assessment of treatment-emergent hypomania/mania, defined as YRMS>8.

  11. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Age (years)

  12. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Gender

  13. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Low wage (less than 5 monthly wages in Brazil)

  14. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Recurrent depression

  15. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Chronic depression

  16. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Refractory depression

  17. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Severe depression

  18. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Benzodiazepine use

  19. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Higher education (>15 years of schooling)

  20. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Age of onset of the depressive episode (years)

  21. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Any anxiety disorder

  22. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Physical activity

  23. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    melancholic depression

  24. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    atypical depression

  25. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    smoking status

  26. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    hypertension

  27. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    diabetes mellitus

  28. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    ethnicity

  29. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    marital status

  30. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    employment status

  31. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    obesity

  32. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    familial psychiatry history

  33. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Novelty seeking

  34. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Any tDCS related adverse event.

  35. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Harm avoidance

  36. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Reward Dependence

  37. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Persistence

  38. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Cooperativeness

  39. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Self-transcendence

  40. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Temperament and Character Inventory - Self-directedness

  41. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    FAS verbal fluency test

  42. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Digit span forward

  43. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Digit span backward

  44. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Trail Making Test - A

  45. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Trail Making Test - B

  46. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Symbol digit

  47. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 10

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment

  48. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 3 and 10

    Motor Cortical Excitability - Cortical silent period (left and right hemispheres)

  49. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 3 and 10

    Motor Cortical Excitability - Intracortical inhibition (left and right hemispheres)

  50. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 3 and 10

    Motor Cortical Excitability - Intracortical facilitation (left and right hemispheres)

  51. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 3 and 10

    Heart rate variability - HF

  52. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 3 and 10

    Heart rate variability - LF

  53. Predictor of response

    Time frame: Week 3 and 10

    Heart rate variability - RMSSD

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo

Other

Collaborators

  • Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Registry information

Official study title

Escitalopram and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Acronym: ELECT-TDCS

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jul 10, 2013
Registry last updated
Dec 5, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.